Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep;11(3):275-285.
doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.08.003.

Providing Evidence for Subclinical CVD in Risk Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Providing Evidence for Subclinical CVD in Risk Assessment

Michael J Blaha et al. Glob Heart. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

When the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) began, the Framingham risk score was the preferred tool for 10-year global coronary heart disease risk assessment; however, the Framingham risk score had limitations including derivation in a homogenous population lacking racial and ethnic diversity and exclusive reliance on traditional risk factors without consideration of most subclinical disease measures. MESA was designed to study the prognostic value of subclinical atherosclerosis and other risk markers in a multiethnic population. In a series of landmark publications, MESA demonstrated that measures of subclinical cardiovascular disease add significant prognostic value to the traditional Framingham risk variables. In head-to-head studies comparing these markers, MESA established that the coronary artery calcium score may be the single best predictor of coronary heart disease risk. Results from MESA have directly influenced recent prevention guidelines including the recommendations on risk assessment and cholesterol-lowering therapy. The MESA study has published its own risk score, which allows for the calculation of 10-year risk of coronary heart disease before and after knowledge of a coronary artery calcium score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are conflicts of interest for this paper for any author.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The design of MESA allows the study the associations between risk factors, subclinical disease burden and progression, and clinical events.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier cumulative-event curves for coronary events among participants with coronary artery calcium Scores of 0, 1 to 100, 101 to 300, and >300.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operator characteristic curves showing area under the curve for FRS alone and FRS in addition to novel risk markers.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between pretest and posttest cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk after the knowledge of the negative result of each risk marker.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Impact of the absence of CAC in reclassifying risk below the threshold for statin consideration suggested by ACC/AHA cholesterol management guidelines, by estimated 10-Year ASCVD risk.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The MESA CHD Risk Score online calculator using two case examples.

References

    1. DAWBER TR, MEADORS GF, MOORE FE. Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1951;41:279–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawber TR, Kannel WB, Lyell LP. AN APPROACH TO LONGITUDINAL STUDIES IN A COMMUNITY: THE FRAMINGHAM STUDY. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;107:539–56. - PubMed
    1. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–47. - PubMed
    1. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97. - PubMed
    1. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, et al. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:871–81. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms