Dissociating perception from judgment in the action-specific effect of blocking ease on perceived speed
- PMID: 27743265
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1222-4
Dissociating perception from judgment in the action-specific effect of blocking ease on perceived speed
Abstract
The action-specific approach to perception claims that a person's ability to act directly influences perceptual processes related to spatial vision. For example, a person's ability to block a moving ball impacts perceptual judgments of the ball's speed. However, an alternative explanation is that action rather than perception influences judgments. Here, we explore this distinction directly. Our method produces two distinct effects, one that is clearly a judgment-based effect and is based on the outcome of the trial (trial-outcome effect) and one that is under debate as to whether or not it is perceptual and is based on the ease with which the ball can be blocked (paddle-size effect). We explored whether these two effects would produce convergence or dissociations across various populations and manipulations. A dissociation is evidence for two separate underlying processes, whereas if the two effects did not dissociate, this would be consistent with claims that both effects were judgment-based. In Experiment 1, we examined whether older and younger adults would show a dissociation between the two effects given some precedent for older adults to show greater susceptibility to nonperceptual factors in their judgments. In Experiment 2, we used a cover story to excuse poor performance and examined its effects on both types of effects. Both experiments revealed dissociations, suggesting that while one effect is judgment-based, the other effect is not. Coupled with prior research, we conclude that the action-specific effect of ease to block a ball on estimated ball speed is perceptual.
Keywords: 3D perception: space perception; Aging; Perception and action.
Similar articles
-
Does ease to block a ball affect perceived ball speed? Examination of alternative hypotheses.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Oct;38(5):1202-14. doi: 10.1037/a0026512. Epub 2011 Dec 26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012. PMID: 22201463
-
Is There a Chastity Belt on Perception?Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;29(1):139-146. doi: 10.1177/0956797617730892. Epub 2017 Oct 30. Psychol Sci. 2018. PMID: 29083964
-
The paddle effect in the pong task is not due to blocking ability of the observer.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Nov;44(11):1799-1804. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000570. Epub 2018 Aug 9. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018. PMID: 30091639
-
Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.Exp Brain Res. 2002 Nov;147(2):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1185-7. Epub 2002 Sep 28. Exp Brain Res. 2002. PMID: 12410328 Review.
-
On the perceptual/motor dissociation: a review of concepts, theory, experimental paradigms and data interpretations.Seeing Perceiving. 2010;23(2):89-151. doi: 10.1163/187847510X503588. Seeing Perceiving. 2010. PMID: 20550823 Review.
Cited by
-
Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):999-1021. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1184-5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 27882456 Review.
-
What you see and what you are told: an action-specific effect that is unaffected by explicit feedback.Psychol Res. 2018 May;82(3):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0848-8. Epub 2017 Mar 2. Psychol Res. 2018. PMID: 28255951
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical