Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation without grafts - A Systematic Review
- PMID: 27746593
- PMCID: PMC5062139
- DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.191289
Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation without grafts - A Systematic Review
Abstract
Implants have a predictable outcome and are the foremost treatment modality for prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients. Due to loss of bone after extraction and pneumatization of maxillary sinus, there is insufficient bone volume for implant placement. The direct maxillary sinus lift procedure has been performed with different grafting materials (autogenous bone grafts, alloplasts, allografts, and xenografts) and without grafting material, having new bone formation around the implant. There is no evidence to prove the need for grafting material in all direct sinus lift procedures, hence the need for this review. Previous meta-analysis showed that survival rates of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses had similar survival rates whether autogenous, allogenous, or alloplastic grafts were used. This paper aims to review scientific data on the direct sinus elevation technique without use of any grafting material, volume of new bone formed, and also mechanism behind this technique. Articles were searched from 1997 to October 2014 in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane CENTRAL. The study eligibility criteria were (1) direct sinus lift procedure without any graft material during implant placement and (2) human or animal studies with a minimum follow-up of 6 months or more. Two authors independently scrutinized the literature and if any controversy was raised, third author's opinion was sought to arrive at a mutual consensus for including the study in the review. Due to the heterogeneity across all studies in all study designs, the data were not pooled and a meta-analysis was not performed. Taking into consideration all factors reviewed in this regard along with the outcomes, the direct sinus lift technique without grafting can be suggested as a viable treatment option keeping in mind the limitations involved. The average bone gain was seen across all studies ranging from 2.37 to 10 mm and with an implant survival rate ranging from 79.9% to 100% across studies.
Keywords: Dentistry; implants; maxillary sinus lift; systematic review.
Similar articles
-
Evidence-Based Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Maxillary Sinus Floor Lift, Graft and Surgical Augmentation Procedures.Front Surg. 2020 Nov 24;7:537138. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.537138. eCollection 2020. Front Surg. 2020. PMID: 33330603 Free PMC article.
-
15-Year Retrospective Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation and Implants: Influence of Bone Substitute Type, Presurgical Bone Height, and Membrane Perforation during Sinus Lift.Biomed Res Int. 2023 Feb 20;2023:9144661. doi: 10.1155/2023/9144661. eCollection 2023. Biomed Res Int. 2023. PMID: 36860810 Free PMC article.
-
Bone formation at the maxillary sinus floor following simultaneous elevation of the mucosal lining and implant installation without graft material: an evaluation of 20 patients treated with 44 Astra Tech implants.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jul;65(7 Suppl 1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.047. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17586351
-
Insufficient evidence for sinus lifts over short implants for dental implant rehabilitation.Evid Based Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):21-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401081. Evid Based Dent. 2015. PMID: 25909937
-
Indirect sinus lift without bone graft material: Systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Apr 1;7(2):e316-9. doi: 10.4317/jced.51716. eCollection 2015 Apr. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015. PMID: 26155353 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Sexual Dimorphism in Schneider Membrane Thickness Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for its Clinical and Forensic Implications.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Dec;23(6):1528-1534. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01531-2. Epub 2021 Mar 16. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024. PMID: 39618438
-
A new approach for better anterior esthetic using platelet-rich fibrin as sole graft material combined with ovate design dental bridge.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Apr-Jun;20(2):219-223. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_264_19. Epub 2020 Apr 7. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020. PMID: 32655228 Free PMC article.
-
Osteogenic and anti-inflammatory effect of the multifunctional bionic hydrogel scaffold loaded with aspirin and nano-hydroxyapatite.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jan 24;11:1105248. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1105248. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 36761294 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jul-Sep;17(3):219-225. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_19_17. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017. PMID: 28936034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Therapeutic outcomes of non-grafted and platelet concentrations-grafted transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation (TSFE): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62407-y. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32245996 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Monje A, Suarez F, Garaicoa CA, Monje F, Galindo-Moreno P, García-Nogales A, et al. Effect of location on primary stability and healing of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2014;23:69–73. - PubMed
-
- Tatum H. Maxillary sinus elevation and subantral augmentation. Birmingham, AL: Lecture, Alabama Implant Study Group; 1997.
-
- Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613–6. - PubMed
-
- Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):216–40. - PubMed
-
- Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15:152–154. 6, 158. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources