Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016:2016:3753650.
doi: 10.1155/2016/3753650. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

Positioning of Weight Bias: Moving towards Social Justice

Affiliations
Review

Positioning of Weight Bias: Moving towards Social Justice

Sarah Nutter et al. J Obes. 2016.

Abstract

Weight bias is a form of stigma with detrimental effects on the health and wellness of individuals with large bodies. Researchers from various disciplines have recognized weight bias as an important topic for public health and for professional practice. To date, researchers from various areas have approached weight bias from independent perspectives and from differing theoretical orientations. In this paper, we examined the similarities and differences between three perspectives (i.e., weight-centric, non-weight-centric (health-centric), and health at every size) used to understand weight bias and approach weight bias research with regard to (a) language about people with large bodies, (b) theoretical position, (c) identified consequences of weight bias, and (d) identified influences on weight-based social inequity. We suggest that, despite differences, each perspective acknowledges the negative influences that position weight as being within individual control and the negative consequences of weight bias. We call for recognition and discussion of weight bias as a social justice issue in order to change the discourse and professional practices extended towards individuals with large bodies. We advocate for an emphasis on social justice as a uniting framework for interdisciplinary research on weight bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Crandall C. S. Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;66(5):882–894. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.882. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreyeva T., Puhl R. M., Brownell K. D. Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans, 1995-1996 through 2004–2006. Obesity. 2008;16(5):1129–1134. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.35. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Puhl R. M., Heuer C. A. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity. 2009;17(5):941–964. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.636. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swift J. A., Hanlon S., El-Redy L., Puhl R. M., Glazebrook C. Weight bias among UK trainee dietitians, doctors, nurses and nutritionists. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2013;26(4):395–402. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kenney E. L., Gortmaker S. L., Davison K. K., Austin S. B. The academic penalty for gaining weight: a longitudinal, change-in-change analysis of BMI and perceived academic ability in middle school students. International Journal of Obesity. 2015;39(9):1408–1413. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.88. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources