Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;94(2):183-196.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000998.

Power Profiles of Commercial Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses

Affiliations

Power Profiles of Commercial Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses

Eon Kim et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the optical power profiles of commercially available soft multifocal contact lenses and compare their optical designs.

Methods: The power profiles of 38 types of multifocal contact lenses-three lenses each-were measured in powers +6D, +3D, +1D, -1D, -3D, and -6D using NIMO TR1504 (Lambda-X, Belgium). All lenses were measured in phosphate buffered saline across 8 mm optic zone diameter. Refractive index of each lens material was measured using CLR 12-70 (Index Instruments, UK), which was used for converting measured power in the medium to in-air radial power profiles.

Results: Three basic types of power profiles were identified: center-near, center-distance, and concentric-zone ring-type designs. For most of the lens types, the relative plus with respect to prescription power was lower than the corresponding spectacle add. For some lens types, the measured power profiles were shifted by up to 1D across the power range relative to their labeled power. Most of the lenses were designed with noticeable amounts of spherical aberration. The sign and magnitude of spherical aberration can either be power dependent or consistent across the power range.

Conclusions: Power profiles can vary widely between the different lens types; however, certain similarities were also observed between some of the center-near designs. For the more recently released lens types, there seems to be a trend emerging to reduce the relative plus with respect to prescription power, include negative spherical aberration, and keep the power profiles consistent across the power range.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CLOQA image of ACUVUE OASYS for PRESBYOPIA Hi Add Power −1.00D (A), Clariti 1 day Hi Add Power −3.00D lens (B), PureVision2 for Presbyopia Hi Add Power +1.00D lens (C), ACUVUE OASYS for PRESBYOPIA Mid Add Power −6.00D lens (D), Proclear multifocal center-near 1.00 Add Power −6.00D lens (E), AIR OPTIX AQUA High Add Power +1.00D lens (F).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Absolute refractive power profiles of Proclear and Biofinity multifocal contact lenses—in four different addition powers. The measurements for central 0.5 mm are unreliable and hence were ignored in all graphs.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Absolute refractive power profiles of ACUVUE OASYS for PRESBYOPIA, 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST, AIR OPTIX AQUA, and DAILIES Aqua Comfort Plus and multifocal contact lenses—in three different addition powers.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Absolute refractive power profiles of PureVision2 for Presbyopia, SofLens, Biotrue ONEday for Presbyopia, and Clariti 1 day multifocal contact lenses—in two different addition powers.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Absolute refractive power profiles of FOCUS DAILIES Progressives and Proclear 1 day multifocal contact lenses—in single progressive addition power.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Relative refractive power profiles of all −3.00D multifocal lenses.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Multifocal contact lenses where spherical aberration is uniform as a function of power.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Multifocal contact lenses where spherical aberration is uniform as a function of power.
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Multifocal contact lenses where spherical aberration is not uniform as a function of power; center-near designs.
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Multifocal contact lenses where spherical aberration is not uniform as a function of power; center-near designs.
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
Multifocal contact lenses where spherical aberration is not uniform as a function of power; center-distance designs.

References

    1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Ho SM, et al. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1731–9. - PubMed
    1. Morgan PB, Efron N, Helland M, et al. Demographics of international contact lens prescribing. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:27–9. - PubMed
    1. Efron N, Morgan PB, Woods CA; International Contact Lens Prescribing Survey Consortium An international survey of daily disposable contact lens prescribing. Clin Exp Optom 2013;96:58–64. - PubMed
    1. Efron N, Nichols JJ, Woods CA, et al. Trends in US Contact Lens Prescribing 2002 to 2014. Optom Vis Sci 2015;92:758–67. - PubMed
    1. Akerman DH. 40 is the New 20/20—presbyopia equals opportunity. Contact Lens Spectrum 2010;25:3 Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/articleviewer.aspx?articleID=103978. Accessed: July 15, 2016.