Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 3;4(1):e000294.
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000294. eCollection 2016.

Large-scale survey of rates of achieving targets for blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipids and prevalence of complications in type 2 diabetes (JDDM 40)

Affiliations

Large-scale survey of rates of achieving targets for blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipids and prevalence of complications in type 2 diabetes (JDDM 40)

Hiroki Yokoyama et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. .

Abstract

Objective: The fact that population with type 2 diabetes mellitus and bodyweight of patients are increasing but diabetes care is improving makes it important to explore the up-to-date rates of achieving treatment targets and prevalence of complications. We investigated the prevalence of microvascular/macrovascular complications and rates of achieving treatment targets through a large-scale multicenter-based cohort.

Research design and methods: A cross-sectional nationwide survey was performed on 9956 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus who consecutively attended primary care clinics. The prevalence of nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, and macrovascular complications and rates of achieving targets of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0%, blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg, and lipids of low-density/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <3.1/≥1.0 mmol/L and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <3.8 mmol/L were investigated.

Results: The rates of achieving targets for HbA1c, blood pressure, and lipids were 52.9%, 46.8% and 65.5%, respectively. The prevalence of microvascular complications was ∼28% each, 6.4% of which had all microvascular complications, while that of macrovascular complications was 12.6%. With an increasing duration of diabetes, the rate of achieving target HbA1c decreased and the prevalence of each complication increased despite increased use of diabetes medication. The prevalence of each complication decreased according to the number achieving the 3 treatment targets and was lower in subjects without macrovascular complications than those with. Adjustments for considerable covariates exhibited that each complication was closely inter-related, and the achievement of each target was significantly associated with being free of each complication.

Conclusions: Almost half of the subjects examined did not meet the recommended targets. The risk of each complication was significantly affected by 1 on-target treatment (inversely) and the concomitance of another complication (directly). Total diabetes care including one-by-one management of modifiable risk factors and complications may be important for high-quality care. The future studies including more subjects and clinics with precise complication status are needed.

Keywords: Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications; Treatment; Type 2 Diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Rate of achieving targets for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), and lipids in all subjects and (B) prevalence of nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=9956).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy in subjects achieving all (A) three targets, (B) two targets, (C) one target, and (D) none, and in subjects (E) without cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and (F) with CVD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Associations of body mass index (BMI) levels with achieving targets for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), and lipids in the upper panels A, B, and C, and with the prevalence of nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy in the lower panels of D, E, and F.

References

    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet 2016;387:1513–30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saaddine JB, Honeycutt AA, Narayan KM et al. Projection of diabetic retinopathy and other major eye diseases among people with diabetes mellitus: United States, 2005–2050. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1740–7. 10.1001/archopht.126.12.1740 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Selvin E, Parrinello CM, Sacks DB et al. Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2010. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:517–25. 10.7326/M13-2411 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molitch ME, DeFronzo RA, Franz MJ et al. , American Diabetes Association. Nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S79–83. - PubMed
    1. Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2007;14:179–83. 10.1080/09286580701396720 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources