Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 30;2(3):162-167.
doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.019. eCollection 2015 Sep.

Contamination during doffing of personal protective equipment by healthcare providers

Affiliations

Contamination during doffing of personal protective equipment by healthcare providers

Seong Mi Lim et al. Clin Exp Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to describe the processes of both the donning and the doffing of personal protective equipment for Ebola and evaluate contamination during the doffing process.

Methods: We recruited study participants among physicians and nurses of the emergency department of Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea. Participants were asked to carry out doffing and donning procedures with a helper after a 50-minute brief training and demonstration based on the 2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention protocol. Two separate cameras with high-density capability were set up, and the donning and doffing processes were video-taped. A trained examiner inspected all video recordings and coded for intervals, errors, and contaminations defined as the outside of the equipment touching the clinician's body surface.

Results: Overall, 29 participants were enrolled. Twenty (68.9%) were female, and the mean age was 29.2 years. For the donning process, the average interval until the end was 234.2 seconds (standard deviation [SD], 65.7), and the most frequent errors occurred when putting on the outer gloves (27.5%), respirator (20.6%), and hood (20.6%). For the doffing process, the average interval until the end was 183.7 seconds (SD, 38.4), and the most frequent errors occurred during disinfecting the feet (37.9%), discarding the scrubs (17.2%), and putting on gloves (13.7%), respectively. During the doffing process, 65 incidences of contamination occurred (2.2 incidents/person). The most vulnerable processes were removing respirators (79.2%), removing the shoe covers (65.5%), and removal of the hood (41.3%).

Conclusion: A significant number of contaminations occur during the doffing process of personal protective equipment.

Keywords: Communicable disease control; Disasters; Ebolavirus; Equipment contamination; Medical devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Pictures describing personal protective equipment. Tape sealing was omitted from procedures. (A) Front view, (B) side view, and (C) back view.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Infographic showing the contamination during doffing procedure. Overall contamination occurred 65 times (2.2/person). The most frequent site was neck, foot, and head. PPE, personal protective equipment.

References

    1. Ebola virus. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1990;65:45–7. - PubMed
    1. Ebola: the virus and the disease. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1999;74:89. - PubMed
    1. Karesh W, Reed P. Ebola and great apes in Central Africa: current status and future needs. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2005;98:237–8. - PubMed
    1. Incident Management System Ebola Epidemiology Team, CDC. Guinea Interministerial Committee for Response Against the Ebola Virus. World Health Organization et al. Update: Ebola virus disease epidemic: West Africa, January 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:109–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kiley MP, Regnery RL, Johnson KM. Ebola virus: identification of virion structural proteins. J Gen Virol. 1980;49:333–41. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources