Effects of an elevated position on time to tracheal intubation by novice intubators using Macintosh laryngoscopy or videolaryngoscopy: randomized crossover trial
- PMID: 27752593
- PMCID: PMC5052847
- DOI: 10.15441/ceem.15.048
Effects of an elevated position on time to tracheal intubation by novice intubators using Macintosh laryngoscopy or videolaryngoscopy: randomized crossover trial
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the time to tracheal intubation using Glidescope videolaryngoscopy (GVL) compared to that of standard laryngoscopy, by using a Macintosh blade (SLM) in a human patient simulator in supine and elevated (ramped) positions.
Methods: In this randomized crossover design, novice intubators (first-year medical students), using both laryngoscopic techniques, attempted tracheal intubation on a human patient simulator with a "normal airway" anatomy (Cormack-Lehane grade I). The simulator was placed in both supine and ramped positions using a commercial mattress system. The mean time to intubation and complications were compared between GVL and SLM in both positions. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO, GVL only) was estimated during intubation in the ramped and supine positions. The primary outcome was time to intubation, and the secondary outcomes included complication rates such as esophageal intubation and dental trauma.
Results: There was no difference in the mean time to intubation in either position (P=0.33). The SLM intubation was significantly faster than GVL (mean difference, 1.5 minutes; P<0.001). The mean POGO score for GVL improved by 8% in the ramped position compared to that in supine position (P=0.018). The esophageal intubation rate for SLM was 15% to 17% compared to 1.3% for GVL; dental trauma occurred in 53% to 56% of GVL, compared to 2% to 6% for SLM (P<0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Novices had shorter intubation times using standard laryngoscopy with a SLM compared to GVL in both supine and ramped positions. GVL resulted in fewer esophageal intubations, but more dental trauma than standard laryngoscopy.
Keywords: Intubation; Laryngoscopy; Ramped position; Supine position; Tracheal.
Conflict of interest statement
Airpal (Coopersburg, PA, USA) supplied the RAMP device evaluated in this study free of charge. We thank Dr Daniel Gabbay for providing this to us for evaluation. Dr Gabbay and Airpal had no involvement whatsoever in study design, statistical analysis or data interpretation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Orotracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients, comparison of GlideScope(®) video laryngoscope and the LMA CTrach™ with direct laryngoscopy.Anesth Essays Res. 2012 Jul-Dec;6(2):174-9. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.108304. Anesth Essays Res. 2012. PMID: 25885612 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Bed-up-Head-Elevated Position With GlideScope Laryngoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):210-219. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004349. Anesth Analg. 2020. PMID: 31348051 Clinical Trial.
-
A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):825-31. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae39db. Anesth Analg. 2009. PMID: 19690253 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing the novel GlideScope Groove videolaryngoscope with conventional videolaryngoscopy: a randomized mannequin study of novice providers.J Clin Anesth. 2013 Dec;25(8):644-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Oct 4. J Clin Anesth. 2013. PMID: 24095892 Clinical Trial.
-
Ramped versus sniffing position for tracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.03.058. Epub 2020 Apr 1. Am J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 32276812
Cited by
-
Comparison of intubating conditions in supine (sniffing) and 25° back-up position using channelled and non-channelled video laryngoscopes - A randomised controlled study.Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Dec;67(12):1090-1095. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_662_23. Epub 2023 Dec 13. Indian J Anaesth. 2023. PMID: 38343674 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of bed angle and height on intubation success during simulated endotracheal intubation in the ramped position.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Mar 13;1(3):257-262. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12035. eCollection 2020 Jun. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020. PMID: 33000040 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Graham CA, Beard D, Henry JM, McKeown DW. Rapid sequence intubation of trauma patients in Scotland. J Trauma. 2004;56:1123–6. - PubMed
-
- Oglesby AJ, Graham CA, Beard D, McKeown DW. Paediatric intubation in Scottish emergency departments. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13:589–95. - PubMed
-
- Altermatt FR, Munoz HR, Delfino AE, Cortinez LI. Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance to apnoea. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:706–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources