The Effect of Hospital Isolation Precautions on Patient Outcomes and Cost of Care: A Multi-Site, Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
- PMID: 27752880
- PMCID: PMC5330996
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3862-4
The Effect of Hospital Isolation Precautions on Patient Outcomes and Cost of Care: A Multi-Site, Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Isolation precautions have negative effects on patient safety, psychological well-being, and healthcare worker contact. However, it is not known whether isolation precautions affect certain hospital-related outcomes.
Objective: To examine the effect of isolation precautions on hospital-related outcomes and cost of care.
Design: Retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study of inpatients admitted to general internal medicine (GIM) services at three academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada between January 2010 and December 2012.
Participants: Adult (≥18 years of age) patients on isolation precautions for respiratory illnesses and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were matched to controls based on propensity scores derived from nine covariates: age, sex, Resource Intensity Weight, number of hospital readmissions within 90 days, total length of stay for hospital admissions within 90 days, site of admission, month of isolation, year of isolation, and Case Mix Group.
Main measures: Thirty-day readmission rates and emergency department visits, hospital length of stay, expected length of stay, adverse events, in-hospital mortality, patient complaints, and cost of care in Canadian doll ars (CAD).
Key results: A total of 17,649 non-isolated patients were admitted to the participating hospitals during the study period. We identified 1506 patients isolated for respiratory illnesses and 745 patients isolated for MRSA. Compared to non-isolated individuals, those on isolation precautions for respiratory illnesses stayed 17 % longer (95 % CI: 9 %, 25 %), stayed 9 % longer than expected (95 % CI: 3 %, 15 %), and had 23 % higher cost of care (95 % CI: 14 %, 32 %). Patients isolated for MRSA had similar outcomes, but they also had a 4.4 % higher (95 % CI: 1.4 %, 7.3 %) rate of readmission to hospital within 30 days.
Conclusions: Isolation precautions are associated with adverse effects which may result in poorer hospital outcomes. Balancing the benefits for the many with the harms to the few will be a future challenge.
Keywords: Hospital Outcomes; Isolation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Isolation Precautions for Hospitalized Patients: The Challenges of Identifying Unintended Individual Consequences and Measuring the Prevention of Community Harm.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):238-240. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3926-5. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 27864785 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;22(2):99-104. doi: 10.1086/501871. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001. PMID: 11232886
-
Review of a two-year methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening program and cost-effectiveness analysis in Singapore.BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 29;15:391. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1131-5. BMC Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 26419926 Free PMC article.
-
Health care utilization, costs, and readmission rates associated with hyponatremia.Hosp Pract (1995). 2013 Feb;41(1):89-95. doi: 10.3810/hp.2013.02.1014. Hosp Pract (1995). 2013. PMID: 23466971
-
Patient Isolation Precautions: Are They Worth It?Can Respir J. 2016;2016:5352625. doi: 10.1155/2016/5352625. Epub 2016 Apr 12. Can Respir J. 2016. PMID: 27445547 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Isolation Precautions in the Inpatient Setting.Hosp Med Clin. 2016 Jan;5(1):30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ehmc.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Hosp Med Clin. 2016. PMID: 32288998 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Adaptation and validation of a quantitative vanA/vanB DNA screening assay on a high-throughput PCR system.Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 12;14(1):3523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54037-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38347048 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Infection and Incidence of Myocarditis: A Multi-Site Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Cureus. 2022 Feb 3;14(2):e21879. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21879. eCollection 2022 Feb. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35265414 Free PMC article.
-
Isolation Precautions for Hospitalized Patients: The Challenges of Identifying Unintended Individual Consequences and Measuring the Prevention of Community Harm.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):238-240. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3926-5. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 27864785 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Lessons from Walking the Medical Distancing Tightrope.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Sep;46(9):542-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 28. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020. PMID: 32620508 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Psychological outcomes of MRSA isolation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020 Jul 14;6(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-0313-6. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020. PMID: 32665604 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Loveday HP, Pellowe CM, Jones SRLJ, Pratt RJ. A systematic review of the evidence for interventions for the prevention and control of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (1996–2004): report to the Joint MRSA Working Party (Subgroup A) J Hosp Infect. 2006;63(Suppl 1):S45–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous