Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 May;17(5):1278-1285.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.14084. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

A Comparison of Request Process and Outcomes in Donation After Cardiac Death and Donation After Brain Death: Results From a National Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Comparison of Request Process and Outcomes in Donation After Cardiac Death and Donation After Brain Death: Results From a National Study

L A Siminoff et al. Am J Transplant. 2017 May.

Abstract

Available literature points to healthcare providers' discomfort with donation after cardiac death (DCD) and their perception of public reluctance toward the procedure. Using a national sample, we report on the communication content of actual DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) approaches by organ procurement organization (OPO) requesters and compare family decision makers' (FDMs') experiences of both modalities. We recruited 1601 FDMs using a validated protocol; 347 (21.7%) were of potential DCD donors. Semistructured telephone interviews yielded FDMs' sociodemographic data, donation attitudes, assessment of approach, final outcomes, and substantiating reasons. Initial analysis consisted of bivariate analyses. Multilevel mixture models compared groups representing authorization outcome and DCD/DBD status. No significant differences in family authorization were found between DCD and DBD cases. Statistically significant associations were found between sociodemographic characteristics and authorization, with white FDMs more likely to authorize DCD or DBD than black FDMs. FDMs of both modalities had similar evaluations of requester skills, topics discussed, satisfaction, and refusal reasons. The findings suggest that the DCD/DBD distinction may not be notable to families. We recommend the use of similar approach strategies and communication skills and the development of education campaigns about the public's acceptance of DCD.

Keywords: donors and donation: deceased; donors and donation: donation after circulatory death (DCD); education; ethics and public policy; health services and outcomes research; organ procurement; organ procurement and allocation; organ procurement organization; physician education; social sciences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bell MD. Non-heart beating organ donation: old procurement strategy--new ethical problems. J Med Ethics. 2003;29(3):176–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zamperetti N, Bellomo R, Ronco C. Defining death in non-heart beating organ donors. J Med Ethics. 2003;29(3):182–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edwards JM, Hasz RD, Jr, Robertson VM. Non-heart-beating organ donation: process and review. AACN Clin Issues. 1999;10(2):293–300. - PubMed
    1. Network OPT. National DSA Dashboard. 2015. Transplant Da.
    1. Donation IoMCoIRoO. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action. Washington, DC: 2006.

Publication types