Authors' reply re: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in induction of labour
- PMID: 27753261
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14016
Authors' reply re: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in induction of labour
Comment on
-
A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 26538408
-
Re: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in induction of labour: Excessive, uterine activity is a maternal, neurological emergency.BJOG. 2016 Nov;123(12):2048. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14014. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 27753252 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
