Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;15(23):3230-3239.
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1241927. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

Estrogen induces RAD51C expression and localization to sites of DNA damage

Affiliations

Estrogen induces RAD51C expression and localization to sites of DNA damage

Anya Alayev et al. Cell Cycle. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Homologous recombination (HR) is a conserved process that maintains genome stability and cell survival by repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The RAD51-related family of proteins is involved in repair of DSBs; consequently, deregulation of RAD51 causes chromosomal rearrangements and stimulates tumorigenesis. RAD51C has been identified as a potential tumor suppressor and a breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Recent studies have also implicated estrogen as a DNA-damaging agent that causes DSBs. We found that in ERα-positive breast cancer cells, estrogen transcriptionally regulates RAD51C expression in ERα-dependent mechanism. Moreover, estrogen induces RAD51C assembly into nuclear foci at DSBs, which is a precursor to RAD51 complex recruitment to the nucleus. Additionally, disruption of ERα signaling by either anti-estrogens or siRNA prevented estrogen induced upregulation of RAD51C. We have also found an association of a worse clinical outcome between RAD51C expression and ERα status of tumors. These findings provide insight into the mechanism of genomic instability in ERα-positive breast cancer and suggest that individuals with mutations in RAD51C that are exposed to estrogen would be more susceptible to accumulation of DNA damage, leading to cancer progression.

Keywords: DNA double-strand break repair; ERα; RAD51C; breast cancer; estrogen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ERα regulates RAD51C expression in an estrogen dependent manner. (A) MDA-MB-231, −468, −436, MCF7, T47D and ZR 75-1 cells were grown in phenol red-free media with 10% charcoal-stripped FBS for 3 d and either serum starved or treated with estrogen for 30 min as indicated. Lysates were generated and the indicated proteins were detected by immunoblot. (B) MDA-MB-231, −468, −436, MCF7, T47D and ZR 75-1 cells were grown in phenol red-free media with 10% charcoal-stripped FBS for 3 d and either serum starved or treated with 10nM estrogen for 24 hr as indicated. Lysates were generated as described in “Materials and Methods” and the indicated proteins were detected by immunoblot. (C) Quantification of RAD51C protein levels normalized to actin from (B) was performed using Odyssey Image Studio Version 4.0 and graphed using Excel.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Estrogen induces RAD51C foci assembly. (A) T47D cells were serum-starved or stimulated with estrogen for 24 hr as indicated. Immunofluorescence was performed as described in “Materials and Methods.” Scale bar represents 50 μm. (B) MCF7 cells were treated and processed as described in (A). (C) MDA-MB-231 cells were treated and processed as described in (A).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
ERα transcriptionally regulates RAD51C expression in estrogen-dependent manner. (A) MCF7 cells were transfected with scambled siRNA or siRNA against ERα and treated with estrogen for 48 hr, as indicated. RT-qPCR was performed as described in “Materials and Methods” and data was plotted using Excel. **p < 0.001; NS, non-statistically significant; n = 3. (B) MCF7 cells were treated as described in (A), RT-qPCR was performed as described in “Materials and Methods” and data was plotted using Excel. **p < 0.001; NS, non-statistically significant; n = 3. (C) MDA-MB-231, −468, −436, MCF7, T47D and ZR 75-1 cells were serum starved or treated with estrogen for 24 hr, as indicated. Lysates were generated as described in “Materials and Methods” and the indicated proteins were detected by immunblot. (D) MCF7 cells were transfected, stimulated with estrogen for 24 hr as indicated and Luciferase reporter assay was performed as described in “Materials and Methods.” Data was plotted using Excel. **p < 0.001. (E) MCF7 cells were transfected, stimulated with estrogen for 24 hr as indicated and Luciferase reporter assay was performed as described in “Materials and Methods.” Data was plotted using Excel. **p < 0.001; n = 3. (F) MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells were either serum starved, treated with estrogen for 24 hr or pre-treated with estrogen for 30 min following treatment with tamoxifen for 24 hr. Lysates were generated as described in “Materials and Methods” and indicated proteins were detected by immunoblot. (G) MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells were either serum starved, treated with estrogen for 24 hr or pre-treated with estrogen for 30 min following treatment with fulvestrant for 24 hr. Lysates were generated as described in “Materials and Methods” and indicated proteins were detected by immunoblot.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Estrogen induces RAD51C foci assembly in ERα dependent manner. (A) T47D cells were transfected with scrambled siRNA, or siRNAs against ERα and either serum-starved or stimulated with estrogen for 24 hr. Immunofluorescence was performed as described in “Materials and Methods.” Scale bar represents 50 μm. (B) MCF7 cells were treated and processed as described in (A).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
GSA-Tumor analysis of RAD51C shows worse clinical prognosis for ERα-positive tumors. (A) MDA-MB-231, MCF7 and T47D cells were transfected with scrambled siRNA or siRNA against RAD51C and treated with estrogen for 48 hr, as indicated. Lysates were generated as described in “Materials and Methods” and the indicated proteins were detected by immunblot. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis using DMFS of ERα-positive tumors separated into 3 categories with respect to RAD51C expression. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis using RFS of Luminal A tumors separated into 3 categories with respect to RAD51C expression. (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis using RFS of Luminal A tumors separated into 3 categories with respect to RAD51C expression.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010; 40:179-204; PMID:20965415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461:1071-8; PMID:19847258; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08467 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Narod SA, Foulkes WD. BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4:665-76; PMID:15343273; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1431 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khanna KK, Jackson SP. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat Genet 2001; 27:247-54; PMID:11242102; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/85798 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Venkitaraman AR. Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 2002; 108:171-82; PMID:11832208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00615-3 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources