Breast cancer incidence trends in Norway and estimates of overdiagnosis
- PMID: 27754936
- DOI: 10.1177/0969141316668379
Breast cancer incidence trends in Norway and estimates of overdiagnosis
Abstract
Objective Fluctuations in the incidence of breast cancer in Norway in the last three decades are partly explained by the use of hormone replacement therapy and mammography screening, but overdiagnosis has also been suggested as a cause. We assessed the trends in breast cancer incidence and overdiagnosis in Norway. Methods We calibrated our microsimulation model to Norwegian Cancer Registration data. The model takes into account the use of mammography (both within and outside the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme) and of hormone replacement therapy. We obtained a proper fit of breast cancer incidence in recent years, when assuming an increase in the background risk for breast cancer, and estimated overdiagnosis. Results We estimated a 2% overdiagnosis rate as a fraction of all cancers diagnosed in women aged 50-100, and a 3% overdiagnosis rate as a fraction of all cancers diagnosed in women aged 50-70 (i.e. screening age). If all of the increased incidence would be the result of the detection of slow growing tumours, these estimates were 7% and 11%, respectively. Conclusion Besides mammography and hormone replacement therapy use, additional risk factors contributed to the sudden increase in breast cancer incidence in Norway. Overdiagnosis estimates due to screening were within the range of international plausible estimates.
Keywords: Breast cancer; hormone replacement therapy; microsimulation; overdiagnosis; screening.
Similar articles
-
Estimation of overdiagnosis using short-term trends and lead time estimates uncontaminated by overdiagnosed cases: Results from the Norwegian Breast Screening Programme.J Med Screen. 2016 Dec;23(4):192-202. doi: 10.1177/0969141315623980. Epub 2016 Mar 2. J Med Screen. 2016. PMID: 26940963 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in aggregate cancer incidence rates in relation to screening and possible overdiagnosis: a word of caution.J Med Screen. 2014 Mar;21(1):24-9. doi: 10.1177/0969141313517676. Epub 2014 Jan 20. J Med Screen. 2014. PMID: 24446330
-
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):491-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22473436
-
Missteps in Current Estimates of Cancer Overdiagnosis.Acad Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(2):226-229. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 Nov 25. Acad Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27894707 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Discrepancies and overdiagnosis in breast cancer organized screening. A "methodology" systematic review].Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2018 Nov;66(6):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2018. PMID: 30316554 French.
Cited by
-
Interval breast cancer rates for tomosynthesis vs mammography population screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar;35(3):1478-1489. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11085-9. Epub 2024 Oct 3. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39363049 Free PMC article.
-
Overdiagnosis Due to Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer among Women Aged 40 Years and Over: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):523. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030523. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 36983705 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical