Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;101(4):804-810.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001531.

Effectiveness of Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus Disease in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Affiliations

Effectiveness of Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus Disease in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Emanuele Nicastro et al. Transplantation. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Most pediatric liver transplantation (LT) centers administer long courses of prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) without evidence of benefit and with significant drug exposure and costs. We aimed at evaluating overall outcomes, direct and putative indirect effects of CMV, possible impact of viremia and risk factors for CMV infection in pediatric LT recipients managed with ganciclovir-based preemptive therapy (PET).

Methods: The records of all the children who underwent LT between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: One hundred children were included. Three children had CMV disease; no CMV-related death or graft loss was recorded. The only identified risk factor for CMV infection was the donor/recipient serostatus (odds ratio, 17.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-157.87; P = 0.012), while viremia per se did not worsen LT outcomes, such as the incidence of acute rejection, Epstein-Barr virus infection, sepsis, biliary and vascular complications, nor graft dysfunction/loss or death at 3 and 5 years after LT. When compared with a historical cohort of children receiving ganciclovir prophylaxis, PET did not differ from prophylaxis for any of the selected outcomes, but was rather associated with lower antiviral drug exposure (6.4 ± 13 days vs 38.6 ± 14 days, P < 0.0001) and cost per patient (2.2 ± 3.9 k&OV0556; vs 6.6 ± 8.2 k&OV0556;, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: PET is effective in controlling CMV in children receiving LT, with lower costs and lower exposure to antivirals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Patient selection and inclusion in the study.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Kaplan-Meier curve comparison of patients managed with preemptive therapy: CMV infection-free survival according to donor (D)/recipient (R) serostatus: D−/R− (N = 5); Dany/R+ (N = 64); D+/R− (N = 16).
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Kaplan-Meier curve comparison of patients managed with preemptive therapy and prophylaxis. A, CMV infection-free survival at 200 days post-LT; proportion of patients without graft dysfunction (B), biliary complications (C), and vascular complications (D) at 3 years after LT.

Comment in

References

    1. Bruminhent J, Razonable RR. Management of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in liver transplant recipients. World J Hepatol. 2014;6:370. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosch W, Heckman MG, Diehl NN. Association of cytomegalovirus infection and disease with death and graft loss after liver transplant in high-risk recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2181. - PubMed
    1. Marcelin JR, Beam E, Razonable RR. Cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients: updates on clinical management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:10658. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freeman RB. The “indirect” effects of cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:2453. - PubMed
    1. Mumtaz K, Faisal N, Husain S. Universal prophylaxis or preemptive strategy for cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:472. - PubMed

MeSH terms