Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
- PMID: 27755541
- PMCID: PMC5068732
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002148
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
Abstract
Background: Core outcome sets (COS) can enhance the relevance of research by ensuring that outcomes of importance to health service users and other people making choices about health care in a particular topic area are measured routinely. Over 200 COS to date have been developed, but the clarity of these reports is suboptimal. COS studies will not achieve their goal if reports of COS are not complete and transparent.
Methods and findings: In recognition of these issues, an international group that included experienced COS developers, methodologists, journal editors, potential users of COS (clinical trialists, systematic reviewers, and clinical guideline developers), and patient representatives developed the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting (COS-STAR) Statement as a reporting guideline for COS studies. The developmental process consisted of an initial reporting item generation stage and a two-round Delphi survey involving nearly 200 participants representing key stakeholder groups, followed by a consensus meeting. The COS-STAR Statement consists of a checklist of 18 items considered essential for transparent and complete reporting in all COS studies. The checklist items focus on the introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of a manuscript describing the development of a particular COS. A limitation of the COS-STAR Statement is that it was developed without representative views of low- and middle-income countries. COS have equal relevance to studies conducted in these areas, and, subsequently, this guideline may need to evolve over time to encompass any additional challenges from developing COS in these areas.
Conclusions: With many ongoing COS studies underway, the COS-STAR Statement should be a helpful resource to improve the reporting of COS studies for the benefit of all COS users.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: DGA, JMB, MC, EG, PRW, and ST are members of the COMET Management Group. DM is a member of the Editorial Board of PLOS Medicine. DD, SG, JJK, JS, and PT declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol).Trials. 2015 Aug 22;16:373. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0913-9. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26297658 Free PMC article.
-
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 16;14(11):e1002447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447. eCollection 2017 Nov. PLoS Med. 2017. PMID: 29145404 Free PMC article.
-
Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement.Trials. 2019 Feb 11;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3230-x. Trials. 2019. PMID: 30744706 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: The AGReMA Statement.JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1045-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14075. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34546296 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Core outcome set for three ophthalmic conditions: a healthcare professional and patient consensus on core outcome sets for amblyopia, ocular motility and strabismus (COSAMS Study).BMJ Open. 2021 May 11;11(5):e042403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042403. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33980515 Free PMC article.
-
A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease and stroke.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0294193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294193. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37956176 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A core set of patient-reported outcomes for population-based cancer survivorship research: a consensus study.J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Apr;15(2):201-212. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00924-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31. J Cancer Surviv. 2021. PMID: 32865766 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review.Qual Life Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02301-x. Epub 2019 Sep 23. Qual Life Res. 2020. PMID: 31549367 Free PMC article.
-
What topics should we teach the parents of admitted neonates in the newborn care unit in the resource-limited setting - a Delphi study.Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019 Jul 11;5:11. doi: 10.1186/s40748-019-0106-8. eCollection 2019. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019. PMID: 31338201 Free PMC article.
References
-
- COMET Initiative. 2016. http://www.comet-initiative.org/. [Accessed 5 May 2016].
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical