Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):271.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0792-0.

Integrating 360° behavior-orientated feedback in communication skills training for medical undergraduates: concept, acceptance and students' self-ratings of communication competence

Cosima Engerer  1 , Pascal O Berberat  1 , Andreas Dinkel  2 , Baerbel Rudolph  2   3 , Heribert Sattel  2 , Alexander Wuensch  4   5
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Integrating 360° behavior-orientated feedback in communication skills training for medical undergraduates: concept, acceptance and students' self-ratings of communication competence

Cosima Engerer et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Feedback is considered a key didactic element in medical education, especially for teaching of communication skills. This study investigates the impact of a best evidence-based practice feedback concept within the context of communication skills training (CST). We evaluate this concept for acceptance and changes in students self-ratings of communication competence.

Methods: Our CST integrating feedback process comprises a short theoretical introduction presenting standards for good communication and a constructive 360° feedback from three perspectives: feedback from peers, from standardized patients (SPs), and from a trainer. Feed-forward process was facilitated for documenting suggestions for improvements based on observable behaviors to maximize learning benefits. Our CST was applied to four groups of eight or nine students. We assessed the data on students' acceptance using a 6-point scale ranging from very good (1) to poor (6), applied a forced choice question to rank didactic items, and assessed changes in student' self-ratings of their communication competence on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results: Thirty-four medical undergraduates (82 % female, 18 % male) in their first clinical year, with an average age of 21.4 years (SD = 1.0), participated in the new training. The concept achieved high acceptance from good to very good: overall impression (M = 1.56), sufficient interaction for discussion (M = 1.15), and constructive learning atmosphere (M = 1.18). Specific elements, such as practical training with SPs (M = 1.18) and feedback by SPs (M = 1.12), showed highest acceptance. The forced choice ranking placed all feedback elements at the top of the list (feedback (FB) by SPs, rank 2; FB by trainer, rank 3; FB by colleagues, rank 4), whereas theoretical elements were at the bottom (theoretical introduction, rank 7; memory card, rank 9). Overall, student self-ratings of communication competence significantly improved in nine of the ten communication items assessed by VAS and showed a pre-post effect size of ES = 0.74 on a global rating.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the training concept based on 360° behavioral feedback was well accepted and generated significant changes in student self-ratings of their communication competence. Further research is needed to determine the effects on objective communication performance.

Keywords: 360° feedback; CST; Communication skills training; Feed-forward; Feedback; Medical education; Medical students; Training concept.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study Design
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Puschmann T. A history of medical education. New York: Hafner Publishing; 1966.
    1. Boud D. Feedback: ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning. Clin Teach. 2015;12(1):3–7. doi: 10.1111/tct.12345. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marton GE, McCullough B, Ramnanan CJ. A review of teaching skills development programmes for medical students. Med Educ. 2015;49(2):149–60. doi: 10.1111/medu.12571. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609–14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Gate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008;42:189–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources