Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;9(10):e003215.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003215.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported With a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the UNOS Database (United Network for Organ Sharing)

Affiliations

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported With a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the UNOS Database (United Network for Organ Sharing)

Kevin J Clerkin et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for heart failure, mortality among those with heart failure, and poor post heart transplant (HT) outcomes. This study sought to determine whether SES is associated with decreased waitlist survival while on left ventricular assist device (LVADs) support and after HT.

Methods and results: A total of 3361 adult patients bridged to primary HT with an LVAD between May 2004 and April 2014 were identified in the UNOS database (United Network for Organ Sharing). SES was measured using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality SES index using data from the 2014 American Community Survey. In the study cohort, SES did not have an association with the combined end point of death or delisting on LVAD support (P=0.30). In a cause-specific unadjusted model, those in the top (hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.11; P=0.005) and second greatest SES quartile (hazard ratio 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.04; P=0.01) had an increased risk of death on device support compared with the lowest SES quartile. Adjusting for clinical risk factors mitigated the increased risk. There was no association between SES and complications. Post-HT survival, both crude and adjusted, was decreased for patients in the lowest quartile of SES index compared with all other SES quartiles.

Conclusions: Freedom from waitlist death or delisting was not affected by SES. Patients with a higher SES had an increased unadjusted risk of waitlist mortality during LVAD support, which was mitigated by adjusting for increased comorbid conditions. Low SES was associated with worse post-HT outcomes. Further study is needed to confirm and understand a differential effect of SES on post-transplant outcomes that was not seen during LVAD support before HT.

Keywords: heart failure; heart transplantation; risk factor; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Freedom from death or delisting while on LVAD support stratified by SES index quartiles
Figure 2
Figure 2
Freedom from Death or Delisting stratified by income (A), type of payment (B), race (C), and education (D)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Competing Risk Plot of Waitlist Events for All Patients
Figure 4
Figure 4
Post-transplant freedom from graft loss stratified by SES index quartiles

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hawkins NM, Jhund PS, McMurray JJV, Capewell S. Heart failure and socioeconomic status: accumulating evidence of inequality. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2012;14:138–146. - PubMed
    1. Foraker RE, Rose KM, Suchindran CM, Chang PP, McNeill AM, Rosamond WD. Socioeconomic Status, Medicaid Coverage, Clinical Comorbidity, and Rehospitalization or Death After an Incident Heart Failure Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Cohort (1987 to 2004) Circulation-Heart Failure. 2011;4:308–316. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Philbin EF, Dec GW, Jenkins PL, DiSalvo TG. Socioeconomic status as an independent risk factor for hospital readmission for heart failure. American Journal of Cardiology. 2001;87:1367–1371. - PubMed
    1. Singh TP, Almond C, Givertz MM, Piercey G, Gauvreau K. Improved survival in heart transplant recipients in the United States: racial differences in era effect. Circulation Heart failure. 2011;4:153–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu V, Bhattacharya J, Weill D, Hlatky MA. Persistent racial disparities in survival after heart transplantation. Circulation. 2011;123:1642–9. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms