Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported With a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the UNOS Database (United Network for Organ Sharing)
- PMID: 27758810
- PMCID: PMC5123683
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003215
Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported With a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the UNOS Database (United Network for Organ Sharing)
Abstract
Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for heart failure, mortality among those with heart failure, and poor post heart transplant (HT) outcomes. This study sought to determine whether SES is associated with decreased waitlist survival while on left ventricular assist device (LVADs) support and after HT.
Methods and results: A total of 3361 adult patients bridged to primary HT with an LVAD between May 2004 and April 2014 were identified in the UNOS database (United Network for Organ Sharing). SES was measured using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality SES index using data from the 2014 American Community Survey. In the study cohort, SES did not have an association with the combined end point of death or delisting on LVAD support (P=0.30). In a cause-specific unadjusted model, those in the top (hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.11; P=0.005) and second greatest SES quartile (hazard ratio 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.04; P=0.01) had an increased risk of death on device support compared with the lowest SES quartile. Adjusting for clinical risk factors mitigated the increased risk. There was no association between SES and complications. Post-HT survival, both crude and adjusted, was decreased for patients in the lowest quartile of SES index compared with all other SES quartiles.
Conclusions: Freedom from waitlist death or delisting was not affected by SES. Patients with a higher SES had an increased unadjusted risk of waitlist mortality during LVAD support, which was mitigated by adjusting for increased comorbid conditions. Low SES was associated with worse post-HT outcomes. Further study is needed to confirm and understand a differential effect of SES on post-transplant outcomes that was not seen during LVAD support before HT.
Keywords: heart failure; heart transplantation; risk factor; transplantation.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Impact of insurance status on heart transplant wait-list mortality for patients with left ventricular assist devices.Clin Transplant. 2017 Feb;31(2):10.1111/ctr.12875. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12875. Epub 2016 Dec 19. Clin Transplant. 2017. PMID: 27862317 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Obesity on Patients Bridged to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;4(10):761-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Sep 7. JACC Heart Fail. 2016. PMID: 27614942 Free PMC article.
-
Ventricular Assist Device Utilization in Heart Transplant Candidates: Nationwide Variability and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes.Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004586. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004586. Circ Heart Fail. 2018. PMID: 29666073 Free PMC article.
-
How does successful bridging with ventricular assist device affect cardiac transplantation outcome?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;13(4):405-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.273722. Epub 2011 Jul 25. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21788304 Review.
-
Heart Transplantation After Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Benefits, Risks, and Outcomes.Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Mar;24(1):9-23. doi: 10.1177/1089253219898985. Epub 2020 Jan 12. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020. PMID: 31928333 Review.
Cited by
-
Adherence to Pharmacotherapies After Heart Transplantation in Relation to Multimorbidity and Socioeconomic Position: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.Transpl Int. 2023 Oct 11;36:11676. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11676. eCollection 2023. Transpl Int. 2023. PMID: 37885807 Free PMC article.
-
Increased disparities in waitlist and post-heart transplantation outcomes according to socioeconomic status with the new heart transplant allocation system.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jan;43(1):134-147. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Aug 27. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024. PMID: 37643656 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes with ventricular assist devices.Clin Cardiol. 2018 Nov;41(11):1463-1467. doi: 10.1002/clc.23070. Epub 2018 Nov 20. Clin Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30225924 Free PMC article.
-
Why Is Social Reintegration Support for Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Necessary?Circ Rep. 2025 Feb 21;7(3):147-153. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0004. eCollection 2025 Mar 10. Circ Rep. 2025. PMID: 40066215 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Disparities in coronary artery bypass grafting between high- and low-volume surgeons and hospitals.Surg Open Sci. 2022 May 20;10:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.05.010. eCollection 2022 Oct. Surg Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 35789961 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hawkins NM, Jhund PS, McMurray JJV, Capewell S. Heart failure and socioeconomic status: accumulating evidence of inequality. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2012;14:138–146. - PubMed
-
- Foraker RE, Rose KM, Suchindran CM, Chang PP, McNeill AM, Rosamond WD. Socioeconomic Status, Medicaid Coverage, Clinical Comorbidity, and Rehospitalization or Death After an Incident Heart Failure Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Cohort (1987 to 2004) Circulation-Heart Failure. 2011;4:308–316. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Philbin EF, Dec GW, Jenkins PL, DiSalvo TG. Socioeconomic status as an independent risk factor for hospital readmission for heart failure. American Journal of Cardiology. 2001;87:1367–1371. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous