Cranioplasty in neurosurgery: is there a way to reduce complications?
- PMID: 27759002
- DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03843-1
Cranioplasty in neurosurgery: is there a way to reduce complications?
Abstract
Background: Cranioplasty (CPL) is a surgical procedure that has still a high rate of complications, although it is commonly considered an easy and routine operation. In the literature, cranioplasty complications may rise up to 41% of cases, and the most frequently reported are infections, autologous bone flap resorption, and hematomas. Although possible, poor cosmetic results are rarely mentioned.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 313 patients who underwent 377 surgical procedures for cranioplasty and reoperations for complications between 2008 and 2014. In other 2 patients we performed a new surgical procedure for the prosthesis fracture. Pediatric patients (aging from 5 to 17 years) have been included in this series in order to compare the complication rate between adult and pediatric populations. The clinical-radiological follow-up of these 313 patients lasted between 1 and 6 years.
Results: Overall complications for cranioplasty were seen in 38 (12.14%) out of the 313 patients. However, complications requiring surgical therapy were seen in 28 patients who underwent 64 new surgical procedures. Adult male patients represented the majority of the group with cranioplasty complications. In the pediatric group we have not observed any complication requiring more than a clinical observation. Infections and autologous bone resorption were the most frequent complications reported in this series; however, we observed a poor cosmetic result as a concomitant but separate complication in more than 26% of our 313 patients.
Conclusions: In this paper we present an overview of all the possible complications of cranioplasty reported in the literature, comparing them with those observed in our series. We also discuss critically the most evident causes of complications, suggesting, when possible, solutions to avoid or limit them.
Similar articles
-
Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Sep;35(9):1473-1480. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-4024-2. Epub 2018 Dec 15. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019. PMID: 30554262
-
Autologous and acrylic cranioplasty: a review of 10 years and 258 cases.World Neurosurg. 2014 Sep-Oct;82(3-4):e525-30. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 13. World Neurosurg. 2014. PMID: 24036124 Review.
-
Timing of cranioplasty: a 10.75-year single-center analysis of 754 patients.J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1648-1652. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161917. Epub 2017 Aug 11. J Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 28799868
-
Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Mar;61:205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Nov 3. J Clin Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 30396817
-
Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients-a systematic review.Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Sep;35(9):1481-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-4025-1. Epub 2019 Jan 4. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019. PMID: 30610476
Cited by
-
Decompressive Craniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The Intensivist's Point of View.Diseases. 2023 Jan 30;11(1):22. doi: 10.3390/diseases11010022. Diseases. 2023. PMID: 36810536 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Complications in Early and Late Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy Due to Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 12;14(12):4176. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124176. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40565921 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.Plast Surg (Oakv). 2021 Aug;29(3):184-196. doi: 10.1177/2292550320928560. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2021. PMID: 34568234 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Meta-analyses of the surgical outcomes using personalized 3D-printed titanium and PEEK vs. standard implants in cranial reconstruction in patients undergoing craniectomy.Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 21;48(1):312. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03470-9. Neurosurg Rev. 2025. PMID: 40116998 Review.
-
Can we do better at measuring patient-reported outcomes after cranioplasty? A systematic review.Neurosurg Rev. 2023 May 6;46(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02006-3. Neurosurg Rev. 2023. PMID: 37148399 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical