Prospects for Weed Control Through Crop Interference
- PMID: 27759217
- DOI: 10.2307/1941794
Prospects for Weed Control Through Crop Interference
Abstract
Crop interference with weed growth is a fundamental method of nonchemical weed control. Crop interference, entailing weed suppression, should be distinguished from crop tolerance of weeds, i.e., relatively small yield loss due to the presence of weeds. Tolerance is less desirable than interference in that it may lead to increases in weed seed populations that can cause future yield losses. Ideally, interference should occur as early as possible in growth to prevent resource consumption by weeds. A path analysis of crop-weed interference is presented. The model can be used to estimate the relative magnitude of early vs. later crop interference with weed growth, and to identify crop traits that contribute to the interference with weed growth. Such analysis can identify crop varieties that show strong early interference with weed growth, and traits associated with strong early interference. For illustrative purposes, the model is applied to characterize differences among soybean varieties in interference with common cocklebur. Weed control by crop interference could be enhanced by crop breeding and management. However, several benefits and costs of interference should be evaluated before undertaking such approaches. First, the degree to which crop interference can substitute for other forms of weed control must be determined. Second, yield costs associated with interference should be measured; these may occur in crop varieties that interfere strongly with weeds, particularly when water, temperature, and mineral nutrients are limiting. A more mechanistic understanding of crop interference is needed so that interference can be enhanced through crop breeding and management while minimizing yield costs.
© 1993 by the Ecological Society of America.
Similar articles
-
Crop Rotation and Intercropping Strategies for Weed Management.Ecol Appl. 1993 Feb;3(1):92-122. doi: 10.2307/1941795. Ecol Appl. 1993. PMID: 27759234
-
Tracking Ideal Varieties and Cropping Techniques for Agroecological Weed Management: A Simulation-Based Study on Pea.Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 4;13:809056. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.809056. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35444680 Free PMC article.
-
Weed interference with peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) and spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) crops under different herbicide treatments: effects on biomass and essential oil yield.J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Jan;98(1):43-50. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8435. Epub 2017 Jun 14. J Sci Food Agric. 2018. PMID: 28503740
-
Weed-induced crop yield loss: a new paradigm and new challenges.Trends Plant Sci. 2023 May;28(5):567-582. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Trends Plant Sci. 2023. PMID: 36610818 Review.
-
Water Use Characteristics of Weeds: A Global Review, Best Practices, and Future Directions.Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 7;12:794090. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.794090. eCollection 2021. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35069649 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Differences for traits associated with early N acquisition in a grain legume and early complementarity in grain legume-triticale mixtures.AoB Plants. 2018 Jan 4;10(1):ply001. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/ply001. eCollection 2018 Feb. AoB Plants. 2018. PMID: 29449911 Free PMC article.
-
Stabilization of yield in plant genotype mixtures through compensation rather than complementation.Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(7):1439-47. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct209. Epub 2013 Sep 18. Ann Bot. 2013. PMID: 24047715 Free PMC article.
-
A canopy architectural model to study the competitive ability of chickpea with sowthistle.Ann Bot. 2008 Jun;101(9):1311-8. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn040. Epub 2008 Mar 28. Ann Bot. 2008. PMID: 18375962 Free PMC article.
-
Ecological implications of row width and cultivar selection on rice (Oryza sativa) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli).Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 22;14(1):24844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76849-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39438631 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring the effectiveness of management interventions at regional scales by integrating ecological monitoring and modelling.Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Oct;74(10):2287-2295. doi: 10.1002/ps.4759. Epub 2017 Nov 23. Pest Manag Sci. 2018. PMID: 29024368 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources