Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction
- PMID: 27759486
- PMCID: PMC5119439
- DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1244958
Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction
Abstract
Background and purpose - Short-term experimental studies have confirmed that there is superior fixation of cementless implants inserted with compaction compared to broaching of the cancellous bone. Patients and methods - 1-stage, bilateral primary THA was performed in 28 patients between May 2001 and September 2007. The patients were randomized to femoral bone preparation with broaching on 1 side and compaction on the other side. 8 patients declined to attend the postoperative follow-up, leaving 20 patients (13 male) with a mean age of 58 (36-70) years for evaluation. The patients were followed with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at baseline, at 6 and 12 weeks, and at 1, 2, and 5 years, and measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and at 1, 2, and 5 years. The subjective part of the Harris hip score (HHS) and details of complications throughout the observation period were obtained at a mean interval of 6.3 (3.0-9.5) years after surgery. Results - Femoral stems in the compaction group had a higher degree of medio-lateral migration (0.21 mm, 95% CI: 0.03-0.40) than femoral stems in the broaching group at 5 years (p = 0.02). No other significant differences in translations or rotations were found between the 2 surgical techniques at 2 years (p > 0.4) and 5 years (p > 0.7) postoperatively. There were no individual stems with continuous migration. Periprosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones was similar at 2 years and at 5 years. Intraoperative femoral fractures occurred in 2 of 20 compacted hips, but there were none in the 20 broached hips. The HHS and dislocations were similar in the 2 groups at 6.3 (3.0-9.5) years after surgery. Interpretation - Bone compaction as a surgical technique with the Bi-Metric stem did not show the superior outcomes expected compared to conventional broaching. Furthermore, 2 periprosthetic fractures occurred using the compaction technique, so we cannot recommend compaction for insertion of the cementless Bi-Metric stem.
Figures
References
-
- Boden H, Adolphson P, Oberg M.. Unstable versus stable uncemented femoral stems: a radiological study of periprosthetic bone changes in two types of uncemented stems with different concepts of fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124(6): 382–92. - PubMed
-
- Boden H, Salemyr M, Skoldenberg O, Ahl T, Adolphson P.. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated tapered titanium stem: results at a minimum of 10 years’ follow-up in 104 hips. J Orthop Sci 2006; 11(2): 175–9. - PubMed
-
- Breusch S J, Norman T L, Revie I C, Lehner B, Caillouette J T, Schneider U, Blaha J D, Lukoschek M.. Cement penetration in the proximal femur does not depend on broach surface finish. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72(1): 29–35. - PubMed
-
- Brown I W, Ring P A.. Osteolytic changes in the upper femoral shaft following porous-coated hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67(2): 218–21. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical