Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education
- PMID: 27759998
- PMCID: PMC5595007
- DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20160081
Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the subjective quality rating of panoramic radiography (PAN) and CBCT in the planning of dental implant procedures by clinicians with different educational backgrounds.
Methods: Radiographic images (PAN and CBCT) of 42 patients were examined as follows: the maxillary (MX) anterior region of patients, the MX posterior region of 16 patients and the mandibular (MD) posterior region of 16 patients. These sites were used for planning of dental implant insertion. Data sets were analyzed by examiners with different training backgrounds: three general practitioners (GP), three oral surgeons (OS) and three maxillofacial surgeons (MS). A standardized questionnaire in a standardized setting was answered by participants.
Results: The majority of participants rated an additional CBCT as "required" (14.0%) or "reasonable" (56.1%). These ratings depended strongly on the area of interest (MX anterior region: 31.1 and 58.9%; MX posterior region: 14.6 and 62.5%; and MD posterior region: 2.8% and 47.9%). MS classified CBCT as required more often than GP and OS (23.8 vs 10.3 and 7.9%; p < 0.001). With the additional information of CBCT, "therapy affecting" ratings were stated high in all groups.
Conclusions: Especially in the anterior and posterior MX, significant subjective benefits for an additional CBCT were seen for planning of dental implant procedures. Participants with fundamental medical education asked for CBCT more often. The results indicate that an improved education in three-dimensional dental radiology is necessary.
Keywords: CBCT; bony implant site; education; panoramic radiography; subjective rating.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jun;25(6):690-5. doi: 10.1111/clr.12126. Epub 2013 Feb 26. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014. PMID: 23442085
-
Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00342.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013. PMID: 21477064
-
Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):665-669. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2103. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017. PMID: 28816186
-
Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.BMC Oral Health. 2018 May 15;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5. BMC Oral Health. 2018. PMID: 29764458 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.Implant Soc. 1995;5(5):7-11. Implant Soc. 1995. PMID: 9571835 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the contour of edentulous jaw sections in the transversal plane and the buccolingual vertical-level disparity in CBCT and panoramic radiography images: a retrospective comparative study.Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Jan 3;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00466-8. Int J Implant Dent. 2023. PMID: 36595148 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of 2D vs 3D imaging and professional experience on dental implant treatment planning.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):929-936. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2511-1. Epub 2018 Jun 16. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 29907931
-
Analysis of Alveolar Bone Morphology of the Maxillary Central and Lateral Incisors with Normal Occlusion.Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 3;55(9):565. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090565. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019. PMID: 31484416 Free PMC article.
-
CBCT-Based Morphological Study of the Accessory Foramina of the Canalis Sinuosus: Prevalence, Morphological Variants, and Significance for Implant Surgery.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 8;14(4):1083. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041083. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40004614 Free PMC article.
-
The comparison of visibility of the maxillary sinus septa between cone-beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiograph images as dependent on the cortical bone thickness: a retrospective comparative study.Int J Implant Dent. 2024 May 7;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00542-1. Int J Implant Dent. 2024. PMID: 38713411 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Choi JW. Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent 2011; 41: 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2011.41.1.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ. Evaluating the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137(Suppl. 4): S58–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.025 - DOI - PubMed
-
- White SC, Weissman DD. Relative discernment of lesions by intraoral and panoramic radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 95: 1117–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0200 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dammann F, Bootz F, Cohnen M, Hassfeld S, Tatagiba M, Kosling S. Diagnostic imaging modalities in head and neck disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 417–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0417 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kämmerer PW, Thiem D, Eisenbeiss C, Dau M, Schulze RK, Al-Nawas B, et al. . Surgical evaluation of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography for therapy planning of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: 419–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.11.012 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources