Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education
- PMID: 27759998
- PMCID: PMC5595007
- DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20160081
Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the subjective quality rating of panoramic radiography (PAN) and CBCT in the planning of dental implant procedures by clinicians with different educational backgrounds.
Methods: Radiographic images (PAN and CBCT) of 42 patients were examined as follows: the maxillary (MX) anterior region of patients, the MX posterior region of 16 patients and the mandibular (MD) posterior region of 16 patients. These sites were used for planning of dental implant insertion. Data sets were analyzed by examiners with different training backgrounds: three general practitioners (GP), three oral surgeons (OS) and three maxillofacial surgeons (MS). A standardized questionnaire in a standardized setting was answered by participants.
Results: The majority of participants rated an additional CBCT as "required" (14.0%) or "reasonable" (56.1%). These ratings depended strongly on the area of interest (MX anterior region: 31.1 and 58.9%; MX posterior region: 14.6 and 62.5%; and MD posterior region: 2.8% and 47.9%). MS classified CBCT as required more often than GP and OS (23.8 vs 10.3 and 7.9%; p < 0.001). With the additional information of CBCT, "therapy affecting" ratings were stated high in all groups.
Conclusions: Especially in the anterior and posterior MX, significant subjective benefits for an additional CBCT were seen for planning of dental implant procedures. Participants with fundamental medical education asked for CBCT more often. The results indicate that an improved education in three-dimensional dental radiology is necessary.
Keywords: CBCT; bony implant site; education; panoramic radiography; subjective rating.
Figures
References
-
- Choi JW. Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent 2011; 41: 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2011.41.1.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ. Evaluating the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137(Suppl. 4): S58–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.025 - DOI - PubMed
-
- White SC, Weissman DD. Relative discernment of lesions by intraoral and panoramic radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 95: 1117–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0200 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dammann F, Bootz F, Cohnen M, Hassfeld S, Tatagiba M, Kosling S. Diagnostic imaging modalities in head and neck disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 417–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0417 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kämmerer PW, Thiem D, Eisenbeiss C, Dau M, Schulze RK, Al-Nawas B, et al. Surgical evaluation of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography for therapy planning of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: 419–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.11.012 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
