Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0165224.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165224. eCollection 2016.

Prolyl Oligopeptidase Inhibition Attenuates Steatosis in the L02 Human Liver Cell Line

Affiliations

Prolyl Oligopeptidase Inhibition Attenuates Steatosis in the L02 Human Liver Cell Line

Da Zhou et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) is a serine endopeptidase that is widely distributed in vivo, particularly in the liver. Significant changes in functional mitochondrial proteins involved with mitochondrial oxidoreductases/transporters and nucleic acid binding proteins were observed after POP inhibition in the liver, which suggested a role of POP in regulating liver energy metabolism. Steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with disturbances in lipid and energy metabolism in hepatocytes. Here, we aimed to study the effect of POP on hepatocyte steatosis.

Methods: The human liver cell line L02 was used to investigate the biological effects of POP. An in vitro cell model of steatosis was successfully induced with oleic acid and palmitic acid. L02 cells were also subjected to S17092 (a POP inhibitor) at different concentrations for 24 or 48 h. Ac-SDKP levels and POP activity were measured to assess the rate of inhibition of POP by S17092. The POP gene and protein expression levels were detected using real-time PCR and Western blots, respectively. Oil red O staining was performed and the triglyceride levels in the L02 cells were also measured. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were detected using CCK-8 and flow cytometry, respectively. The expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism was detected using real-time PCR. The effects of POP inhibition on LC3B II were detected by Western blot.

Results: Compared with the control, the POP mRNA levels increased by approximately 30%, and the POP protein levels increased by almost 60% in the steatotic L02 cells. After S17092 (0.026~130 μM) incubation for 24 or 48 h, cell proliferation was significantly decreased in the free fatty acid (FFA)-treated cells at 26-130 μM; however, S17092 did not affect the proliferation of L02 cells after 24 h of incubation with S17092 at 0.026-65 μM without FFA treatment. S17092 treatment (13 and 26 μM) also elicited no significant effect on apoptosis in normal L02 cells, but FFA treatment increased cell apoptosis, which was attenuated by S17092 incubation. S17092 treatment inhibited intracellular POP activity and decreased the AcSDKP level at the concentration of 0.026-26 μM. After treatment with FFA for 24 h, oil red O staining revealed significant lipid accumulation in the cells in the model group compared with the controls; however, lipid accumulation was suppressed after the administration of S17092 (13 and 26 μM). Accordingly, the triglyceride levels in the FFA-treated cells were approximately 5-fold greater than those of the controls and were decreased by approximately 25% and 45% after the administration of S17092 at 13 and 26 μM, respectively. The mRNA levels of FASN, PPAR-γ, and SREBP-1c were higher in the FFA-treated cells than in the normal controls, and all of these levels were significantly inhibited in the presence of S17092 at both 13 and 26 μM. S17092 treatment did not affect LC3B II in the FFA-treated cells compared with FFA treatment alone.

Conclusion: The expression of POP increases with hepatocyte steatosis, and POP inhibitors can significantly reduce intracellular lipid accumulation, which might be related to the inhibition of genes involved in lipid synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. L02 cell steatosis and POP expression after FFA treatment for 24 h.
(A-B) Oil red O staining of the control (A) and free fatty acid-treated cells (B). (C) Triglyceride concentrations in the control and FFA-treated cells. (D-E) POP mRNA expressions (D) and protein levels (E) in the control and FFA-treated cells. CON: control; FFA: free fatty acids; TG: triglyceride. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Effects of the POP inhibitor S17092 on L02 proliferation and apoptosis with and without FFA.
(A) The proliferation of L02 cells treated with 0.026–130 μM S17092 with or without FFA for 24 h. (B) The proliferation of L02 cells treated with 0.026–130 μg/ml S17092 with or without FFA for 48 h. (C) The apoptosis rates of the L02 cells treated with S17092 with or without FFA for 24 h. (D) Intracellular POP activity in the control and FFA-treated L02 cells after incubation with S17092 at 0.026–26 μM for 2 h. (E) The intracellular AcSDKP level in the control and FFA-treated L02 cells after incubation with S17092 at 0.026–26 μM for 24 h. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Expressions of genes involved in lipid metabolism in L02 cells with or without POP inhibition by S17902.
(A-F) Oil red O staining of control cells (A), FFA-treated cells (B), cells treated with FFA+ S17902 (0.026 μM), (C) FFA+ S17902 (0.26 μM), (D) FFA+ S17902 (13 μM), (E) or FFA+ S17902 (26 μM) (F) for 24 h; (G) TG concentration in the L02 cells treated with S17092 for 24 h.(H) FASN/PPAR-γ/SREBP-1c mRNA expression levels in the controls and FFA-treated L02 cells with or without S17092 incubation for 24 h. (I-J) LC3B II protein expression levels in the controls and FFA-treated L02 cells with or without S17092 incubation for 24 h. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang F-S, Fan J-G, Zhang Z, Gao B, Wang H-Y. The global burden of liver disease: The major impact of China. Hepatology. 2014;60(6):2099–108. 10.1002/hep.27406 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yki-Järvinen H. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a cause and a consequence of metabolic syndrome. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2014;2(11):901–10. 10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70032-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iacono A, Raso GM, Canani RB, Calignano A, Meli R. Probiotics as an emerging therapeutic strategy to treat NAFLD: focus on molecular and biochemical mechanisms. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22(8):699–711. Epub 2011/02/05. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.10.002 S0955-2863(10)00240-8 [pii]. . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glass CK, Ogawa S. Combinatorial roles of nuclear receptors in inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(1):44–55. Epub 2006/02/24. nri1748 [pii] 10.1038/nri1748 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joseph SB, Castrillo A, Laffitte BA, Mangelsdorf DJ, Tontonoz P. Reciprocal regulation of inflammation and lipid metabolism by liver X receptors. Nat Med. 2003;9(2):213–9. Epub 2003/01/14. 10.1038/nm820 nm820[pii]. . - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources