Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:2020489.
doi: 10.1155/2016/2020489. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

Late-Developing Supernumerary Premolars: Analysis of Different Therapeutic Approaches

Affiliations

Late-Developing Supernumerary Premolars: Analysis of Different Therapeutic Approaches

Sergio Paduano et al. Case Rep Dent. 2016.

Abstract

This case series describes the different potential approaches to late-developing supernumerary premolars (LDSP). LDSP are supernumerary teeth (ST) formed after the eruption of the permanent dentition; usually they develop in the premolar region of the upper and lower jaw. The choice to extract or to monitor the LDSP depends on many factors and has to be carefully planned due to the several risks that either the monitoring or the extraction could provoke. These four cases of LDSP showed different treatment plan alternatives derived from a scrupulous assessment of the clinical and radiographic information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case 1 radiography: before treatment 2004 (a), before rebonding, ST in 4.5–4.6 region, 2006 (b), 5 years after debonding 2011 (c), and after the extraction of the ST 2013 (d).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Case 2 radiography: before treatment 2006 (a), before rebonding, ST in regions 3.4–3.5, 4.4–4.5, and 2.5–2.6, 2009 (b), 3 years after debonding 2012 (c), 4 years after debonding 2013 (d), and after the extractions of ST in regions 4.4–4.5 and 2.5–2.6, 2015 (e).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case 3 intraoral image: lingual bulge in 4.4–4.5 region.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Case 3 radiography: ST in 4.4–4.5 region 2015 (a) and after extraction 2015 (b).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Case 3 CBCT: no continuity between the ST's root and the alveolar nerve (a, b) and root resorption of contiguous teeth, indicated by the white arrows (c–e).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Case 4 radiography: before treatment 2011 (a), after treatment, ST in regions 3.4–3.5 and 4.4–4.5, 2014 (b), and after extraction of ST 2014 (c).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Case 4 CBCT: root resorption of contiguous teeth, indicated by the white arrows ((a) 4.3–4.4 and (b) 3.4–3.5).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parolia A., Kundabala M., Dahal M., Mohan M., Thomas M. S. Management of supernumerary teeth. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2011;14(3):221–224. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.85791. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McKibben D. R., Brearley L. J. Radiographic determination of the prevalence of selected dental anomalies in children. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1971;28(6):390–398. - PubMed
    1. Smith J. D. Hyperdontia: report of case. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1969;79(5):1191–1192. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1969.0068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu J. F. Characteristics of premaxillary supernumerary teeth: a survey of 112 cases. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1995;62(4):262–265. - PubMed
    1. Primosch R. E. Anterior supernumerary teeth—assessment and surgical intervention in children. Pediatric dentistry. 1981;3(2):204–215. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources