Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;35(6):967-972.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1956-6. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

Feasibility and safety of augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using smartglass

Affiliations

Feasibility and safety of augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using smartglass

H Borgmann et al. World J Urol. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the feasibility, safety and usefulness of augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using smartglass (SG).

Methods: Seven urological surgeons (3 board urologists and 4 urology residents) performed augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using SG for 10 different types of operations and a total of 31 urological operations. Feasibility was assessed using technical metadata (number of photographs taken/number of videos recorded/video time recorded) and structured interviews with the urologists on their use of SG. Safety was evaluated by recording complications and grading according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Usefulness of SG for urological surgery was queried in structured interviews and in a survey.

Results: The implementation of SG use during urological surgery was feasible with no intrinsic (technical defect) or extrinsic (inability to control the SG function) obstacles being observed. SG use was safe as no grade 3-5 complications occurred for the series of 31 urological surgeries of different complexities. Technical applications of SG included taking photographs/recording videos for teaching and documentation, hands-free teleconsultation, reviewing patients' medical records and images and searching the internet for health information. Overall usefulness of SG for urological surgery was rated as very high by 43 % and high by 29 % of surgeons.

Conclusions: Augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using SG is both feasible and safe and also provides several useful functions for urological surgeons. Further developments and investigations are required in the near future to harvest the great potential of this exciting technology for urological surgery.

Keywords: Google Glass; Surgical training; Technology; Urology; Wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World J Surg. 2016 Jan;40(1):242-4 - PubMed
    1. Surg Innov. 2016 Apr;23 (2):156-65 - PubMed
    1. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;21(11):1297-9 - PubMed
    1. Front Surg. 2014 Sep 19;1:39 - PubMed
    1. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Sep;8(5):951-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources