Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 20:22:3843-3848.
doi: 10.12659/msm.897406.

Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index is a Valuable and Non-Invasive Index for Elevated General Heart End-Diastolic Volume Index Estimation in Septic Shock Patients

Affiliations

Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index is a Valuable and Non-Invasive Index for Elevated General Heart End-Diastolic Volume Index Estimation in Septic Shock Patients

Jie Zhao et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the inferior vena cava respirophasic variation (IVC collapsibility index [IVCCI]) and the general heart end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI). By determining the above relationship, we could evaluate the utility of IVCCI as an indicator. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-two septic patients were finally enrolled in this study. The inferior vena cava's diameter was measured with the largest at the end of expiration (IVC3) and with the smallest at the end of inspiration (IVCi) on the ultrasound (IVCCI=[(IVCD e - IVCD i)/IVCD e] ×100%). The central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac index (CI), and GEDVI were also measured at least 3 times. After fluid resuscitation therapy, the patients with a CI increase induced by more than 15% and less than 15% were classified as the positive response group (PRG) and the negative response group (NRG), respectively. RESULTS After treatment, the average levels of CVP, CI, and GEDVI were significantly higher (P<0.01) in both groups, whereas the IVCCI was reduced. CVP, CI, and GEDVI were negatively correlated with IVCCI in both groups. The correlation coefficient between IVCCI and GEDVI was the greatest (correlation coefficient in the PRG group was 0.889 and in the NRG group it was 0.672). The ROC curve analysis indicated that IVCCI illustrated the best area under the curve, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%, and a cut-off value of 12.9% to predict GEDVI <600 ml/m2 in the PRG group. CONCLUSIONS IVCCI was a good predictor of low-volume state. The IVCCI appears to be a valuable and non-invasive index for the estimation of elevated GEDVI during fluid resuscitation in septic shock patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurement of IVC (arrows) on ultrasonography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC analysis of IVCCI in predicting fluid responsiveness for a GEDWI ≤600 mL/m2. The area under the curve was 0.917 in PRG group. Threshold values of IVCCI are given with their respective sensitivity and specificity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Serial changes in GEDVI and IVCCI. The same symbols connected by straight lines indicate identical patients. (deep blue symbols) Initial measurement; (light blue symbols) subsequent measurement.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anand IS, Ferrari R, Kalra GS, et al. Edema of cardiac origin. Studies of body water and sodium, renal function, hemodynamic indexes, and plasma hormones in untreated congestive cardiac failure. Circulation. 1989;80:299–305. - PubMed
    1. Kauvar DS, Wade CE. The epidemiology and modern management of traumatic hemorrhage: US and international perspectives. Crit Care. 2005;38:185–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seymour CW, Rosengart MR. Septic shock: Advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2015;314:708–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monge GM, Gil AD, Monrove JC. Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care. 2009;13:142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, et al. Global end diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest. 2003;124:1900–8. - PubMed