Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 20:6:35673.
doi: 10.1038/srep35673.

Antigen-affinity controls pre-germinal center B cell selection by promoting Mcl-1 induction through BAFF receptor signaling

Affiliations

Antigen-affinity controls pre-germinal center B cell selection by promoting Mcl-1 induction through BAFF receptor signaling

Felix M Wensveen et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Upon antigen encounter, the responsive B cell pool undergoes stringent selection which eliminates cells with low B cell receptor (BCR) affinity. Already before formation of the germinal center, activated B cells of low-affinity are negatively selected in a process that is molecularly not well understood. In this study, we investigated the mechanism behind pre-GC affinity-mediated B cell selection. We applied affinity mutants of HEL antigen and found that rapidly after activation B cells become highly dependent on the cytokine BAFF. Moreover, expression of BAFF receptor CD268 is regulated in a BCR-affinity dependent fashion. High affinity responses via BAFF correlated with PI3K activation, which controlled expression of the pro-survival protein Mcl-1, and thereby increased survival. In the presence of excess BAFF, or in absence of the Mcl-1 antagonist Noxa, more low-affinity B cells survived the first two days after antigen encounter. This resulted in increased numbers of antigen-specific B cells of low affinity upon immunization and reduced the overall affinity of cells that contributed to the germinal center reaction. Our findings elucidate a crucial molecular pathway of B cell selection in the earliest phases of activation by identifying a novel link between BCR affinity and BAFF-R signaling towards Mcl-1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. BCR affinity correlates with CD25 and BAFF-R induction.
(a) HELTG B cells were stimulated for 48 h with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in combination with 100 ng/ml BAFF. Proliferation, activation and viability were assessed by CFSE dilution, GL7 induction and PI negativity respectively using flow cytometry (n = 3). (b) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in combination with 100 ng/ml BAFF. Viability was followed over time by determining the PI negative fraction (n = 3). (c) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in combination with 100 ng/ml BAFF. After 48 h, cell surface expression of indicated molecules was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3). (d) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in combination with 100 ng/ml BAFF. Cell surface expression of CD25 and BAFF-R was followed over time by flow cytometry (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-testing). GMI = Geometric Mean Intensity.
Figure 2
Figure 2. BAFF but not IL-2 controls early activated B cell survival.
(a,b) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in combination with (a) 10 ng/ml or 100 ng/ml of IL-2 or (b) with 50 ng/ml or 1000 ng/ml of BAFF and viability (PI) was analyzed after 48 h by flow cytometry (n = 3–4). (c) HELTG B cells were left untreated (Medium) or stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL in the presence or absence of 100 ng/ml BAFF and viability (PI) was assessed after 48 h by flow cytometry. Shown is the fold increase in the percentage of viable cells after BAFF stimulation compared to cells cultured in absence of BAFF (n = 3). (d) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x and cultured on irradiated 3T3 cells transfected with a membrane-bound form of human BAFF (3TBAFF) or empty vector (3TEV). Viability (PI) was assessed after 48 h by flow cytometry (n = 3). (e) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in combination with 100 ng/ml BAFF. BAFF-R mRNA levels were analyzed after 48 h by qPCR (n = 3). Values show means ± sem. Shown is relative induction of gene expression compared to Day 0. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Student’s t-test and ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-testing).
Figure 3
Figure 3. BAFF controls Mcl-1 protein levels in a BCR affinity-dependent manner.
(a) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in the presence 100 ng/ml BAFF. (n = 8) (b) HELTG B cells were stimulated for 24 h with 100 ng/ml HEL, 100 ng/ml BAFF or both (n = 3) (c) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in the presence or absence of 100 ng/ml BAFF (n = 3). Protein levels were quantified using densitometry and mean levels normalized for β-actin are shown in comparison to T = 0. (d) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in the presence 100 ng/ml BAFF or with 100 ng/ml HEL3x in combination with 500 ng/ml BAFF (HiBaff). Total cell lysates were then probed by western blot for the indicated proteins. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Affinity ‘scale bars’ correspond with high (HEL), middle (HEL2x) or low (HEL3x) affinity ligands used for stimulation (n = 3). Values show means ± sem. *P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test and ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-testing).
Figure 4
Figure 4. BCR affinity promotes BAFF induced PI3K signaling.
(a,b) HELTG B cells were left unactivated (Medium), or stimulated with 100 ng/ml BAFF alone (BAFF only) or in combination with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in the presence or absence of (a) the Pan-PI3K inhibitor Ly249002 or (b) the PI3Kδ inhibitor CAL-101. After 48 h viability and Mcl-1 protein levels were assessed by flow cytometry (n = 3). (c) HELTG B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml BAFF in combination with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x. After 48 h, cells were deprived from stimuli for 3 h, followed by stimulation with 500 ng/ml BAFF. pAktT308 levels were measured by intracellular flow cytometry at the indicated time points (n = 3). (d) HELTG B cells were activated with the indicated stimuli. Mcl-1 and pGSK3β levels were determined by western blot. β-actin was used as a loading control. Quantification shows fold induction over the signal on day 0, normalized for β-actin. (e) HELTG B cells were left inactivated (Medium), or stimulated with 100 ng/ml BAFF alone (BAFF only) or in combination with 100 ng/ml HEL, HEL2x or HEL3x in the presence of solvent only (DMSO)or the GSK3 inhibitors XXVI or CHIR99021 (CHIR). All cells were cultured in the presence of 1 μM QVD to exclude caspase-mediated Mcl-1 breakdown. After 24 h Mcl-1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry (n = 3). Values show means ± sem. GMI = Geometric Mean Intensity *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-testing).
Figure 5
Figure 5
BCR affinity promotes BAFF-mediated Mcl-1 stabilization (a) 5 × 105 purified HELTG B cells (Ly5.2) were injected in WT (Ly5.1) recipients. After 24 h, recipients were immunized with HEL/Ova or HEL3x/Ova. After 48 h, Mcl-1 and BAFF-R expression were assessed in donor and recipient B cells (n = 3). (b) Mice were immunized with R-Phycoerythrin (PE) in alum. After 6 days, splenic B cells were stained with PE. Mcl-1 and BAFF-R expression was analyzed in resting (GL7Dim) B cells, or in high (PEBright) or low (PEDim) affinity Germinal Center (GL7BrightCD38Dim) B cells. Representative flow cytometry plots of cells gated for B220+ is shown (n = 5). (c,d) 5 × 105 purified CFSE-labeled HELTG B cells (Ly5.1/2) were injected in WT or BAFFTG (both Ly5.2) recipients. After 24 h, recipients were immunized i.p. with HEL/Ova or HEL3x/Ova. After 48 h, cells were analyzed (c) The number of donor cells was quantified in spleen (n = 3–5). (d) Representative flow cytometry plots of B cells transferred to WT recipients and left non-immunized or immunized with HEL3x/Ova (HEL3x) or HEL/Ova (HEL) GMI = Geometric Mean Intensity. Gated is for B220+CD45.1+CD45.2+ cells. Values show means ± sem. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (Student’s t-test and ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-testing).
Figure 6
Figure 6. BAFF signaling limits survival after low-affinity triggering in vivo.
(a) WT and BAFFTG mice were immunized i.p. with TNP-KLH in alum. Relative and absolute Germinal Center (GC; B220+CD38DimGL7+) cell numbers were quantified in spleen and draining Lymph node after 12 days (n = 4–6). (b–f) WT and BAFFTG mice were immunized i.p. with PE in alum. After 12 days, mice were sacrificed and analyzed (n = 5). (b) The fraction of PE-binding B cells as a percentage of total GC B cells was determined by flow cytometry. (c) Germinal center B cells were stained in vitro with an increasing amount of PE and staining was visualized by flow cytometry. (d) quantification of data shown in c. PE-binding cells as a percentage of cells stained with 100 ng/ml PE (max.) is shown. (e) ELISA plates were coated with increasing amounts of PE. Antigen-binding IgG1 antibodies in serum were quantified. Values show means ± sem. (f) PE+ and PE B220+ B cells were analyzed for Mcl-1 expression by flow cytometry. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 7
Figure 7. Noxa sets a survival threshold for high-affinity B cells.
(a,b) HELTG (WT) or Noxa−/−HELTG (Noxa−/−) B cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml BAFF in combination with 100 ng/ml HEL or HEL2x. After 48 h Mcl-1 protein levels were determined by (a) western blot (β-actin was used as a loading control) and (b) Flow Cytometry. (c) HELTG (Ly5.1/2) and Noxa−/−HELTG (Ly5.2) B cells were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and 5 × 105 cells were injected in Ly5.1 WT recipients. After 24 h, recipients were immunized with HEL/Ova or HEL3x/Ova in alum. After 48 h donor cell ratios were determined in spleen and draining lymph node (n = 3–4). Dashed line indicates ratio between cells at time of injection. Values show means ± sem. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shih T. A., Meffre E., Roederer M. & Nussenzweig M. C. Role of BCR affinity in T cell dependent antibody responses in vivo. Nat Immunol 3, 570–575, doi: 10.1038/ni803 (2002). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dal Porto J. M., Haberman A. M., Kelsoe G. & Shlomchik M. J. Very low affinity B cells form germinal centers, become memory B cells, and participate in secondary immune responses when higher affinity competition is reduced. J Exp Med 195, 1215–1221 (2002). - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Silva N. S. & Klein U. Dynamics of B cells in germinal centres. Nat Rev Immunol 15, 137–148, doi: 10.1038/nri3804 (2015). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan T. D. et al. Antigen affinity controls rapid T-dependent antibody production by driving the expansion rather than the differentiation or extrafollicular migration of early plasmablasts. J Immunol 183, 3139–3149, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901690 (2009). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wensveen F. M., van Gisbergen K. P. & Eldering E. The fourth dimension in immunological space: how the struggle for nutrients selects high-affinity lymphocytes. Immunol Rev 249, 84–103, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01156.x (2012). - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources