Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 18;6(4):37.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics6040037.

Fluid Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury and Intended Context of Use

Affiliations
Review

Fluid Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury and Intended Context of Use

Tanya Bogoslovsky et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of death and disability around the world. The lack of validated biomarkers for TBI is a major impediment to developing effective therapies and improving clinical practice, as well as stimulating much work in this area. In this review, we focus on different settings of TBI management where blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers could be utilized for predicting clinically-relevant consequences and guiding management decisions. Requirements that the biomarker must fulfill differ based on the intended context of use (CoU). Specifically, we focus on fluid biomarkers in order to: (1) identify patients who may require acute neuroimaging (cranial computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (2) select patients at risk for secondary brain injury processes; (3) aid in counseling patients about their symptoms at discharge; (4) identify patients at risk for developing postconcussive syndrome (PCS), posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) or chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE); (5) predict outcomes with respect to poor or good recovery; (6) inform counseling as to return to work (RTW) or to play. Despite significant advances already made from biomarker-based studies of TBI, there is an immediate need for further large-scale studies focused on identifying and innovating sensitive and reliable TBI biomarkers. These studies should be designed with the intended CoU in mind.

Keywords: TBI management; biomarkers; traumatic brain injury (TBI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hyder A.A., Wunderlich C.A., Puvanachandra P., Gururaj G., Kobusingye O.C. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: A global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:341–353. - PubMed
    1. Rubiano A.M., Carney N., Chesnut R., Puyana J.C. Global neurotrauma research challenges and opportunities. Nature. 2015;527:S193–S197. doi: 10.1038/nature16035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levin H.S., Diaz-Arrastia R.R. Diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management of mild traumatic brain injury. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:506–517. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00002-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bazarian J.J., Atabaki S. Predicting postconcussion syndrome after minor traumatic brain injury. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2001;8:788–795. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00208.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teasdale G., Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0. - DOI - PubMed