Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan-Mar;48(1):62-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

Bacterial selection for biological control of plant disease: criterion determination and validation

Affiliations

Bacterial selection for biological control of plant disease: criterion determination and validation

Monalize Salete Mota et al. Braz J Microbiol. 2017 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the biocontrol potential of bacteria isolated from different plant species and soils. The production of compounds related to phytopathogen biocontrol and/or promotion of plant growth in bacterial isolates was evaluated by measuring the production of antimicrobial compounds (ammonia and antibiosis) and hydrolytic enzymes (amylases, lipases, proteases, and chitinases) and phosphate solubilization. Of the 1219 bacterial isolates, 92% produced one or more of the eight compounds evaluated, but only 1% of the isolates produced all the compounds. Proteolytic activity was most frequently observed among the bacterial isolates. Among the compounds which often determine the success of biocontrol, 43% produced compounds which inhibit mycelial growth of Monilinia fructicola, but only 11% hydrolyzed chitin. Bacteria from different plant species (rhizosphere or phylloplane) exhibited differences in the ability to produce the compounds evaluated. Most bacterial isolates with biocontrol potential were isolated from rhizospheric soil. The most efficient bacteria (producing at least five compounds related to phytopathogen biocontrol and/or plant growth), 86 in total, were evaluated for their biocontrol potential by observing their ability to kill juvenile Mesocriconema xenoplax. Thus, we clearly observed that bacteria that produced more compounds related to phytopathogen biocontrol and/or plant growth had a higher efficacy for nematode biocontrol, which validated the selection strategy used.

Keywords: Antibiosis; Mesocriconema xenoplax; Obligate parasites; Perennial plants; Rhizobacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percent bacteria producing compounds related to biocontrol and/or promoting growth depending on the total isolates number. (A) AMI, amylase; AMO, ammonia; ANT, antibiotics (halos type I – ≤10 mm; II – ≥11 and ≤20 mm; and III – ≥21 mm); FOS, phosphate solubilization; GEL, proteases medium gelatin; LIT, proteinase medium Litmus®; CHI, chitinase; TWN, lipases medium Tween 80. (B) Groups formed as the isolation origin (Ficus carica, Gramineae, Leguminoseae, others, Liliaceae, Prunus persica, soil, Tagetes).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of isolates (total = 1219) grouped as reaction intensity: (i) chitinolytic; (ii) lipolytic; (iii) proteolytic on gelatin medium; (iv) proteolytic Litmus® milk medium; (v) ammonia-production; (vi) amylase-production; (vii) antibiotic against Monilinia fructicola; (viii) phosphate-solubilization.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage of isolates with positive reaction grouped as isolation niche (phylloplane, rhizosphere and soil): (i) individually chitinolytic (135); (ii) lipolytic (604); (iii) proteolytic on gelatin medium (839); (iv) proteolytic medium Litmus® milk (630); (v) ammonia-producers (531); (vi) amylolytic (443); (vii) antibiotics producing (529); (viii) phosphate solubilizers (530). Values between brackets represent the number of isolates with positive results.

References

    1. Hyakumachi M. Research on biological control of plant diseases: present state and perspectives. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2013;79(6):435–440.
    1. Gray E.J., Smith D.L. Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant–bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005;37:395–412.
    1. Kloepper J.W., Schroth M.N. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacterial. INRA; Angers: 1978. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on radishes; pp. 879–882.
    1. Van Loon L.C. Plant responses to plant growth promoting bacteria. Plant Pathol. 2007;119:243–254.
    1. Lugtenberg B., Kamilova F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:541–556. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources