Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;9(4):487-495.
doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9376-1.

Social media and your practice: navigating the surgeon-patient relationship

Affiliations
Review

Social media and your practice: navigating the surgeon-patient relationship

Alexander S McLawhorn et al. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Utilization of social media both in the private and professional arenas has grown rapidly in the last decade. The rise of social media use within health care can be viewed as the Internet-based corollary of the patient-centered care movement, in which patient perspectives and values are central to the delivery of quality care. For orthopedic surgeons and their practices, general-purpose online social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter, are convenient platforms for marketing, providing patient education and generating referrals. Virtual health communities are used less frequently by orthopedic surgeons but provide forums for patient engagement and active surgeon-to-patient communication via blogs and ask-the-doctor platforms. This commentary reviews the current state of social media use in orthopedic practice, with particular emphasis on managing the extension of the surgeon-patient relationship online, including the unique practice risks social media poses, such as privacy concerns, potential liability, and time consumption.

Keywords: Blogging; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; Marketing of health services; Medical practice management; Physician-patient relations; Social media; Twitter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Human and animal rights and informed consent This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

    1. Perrin A, Duggan M. Americans’ Internet Access: 2000–2015. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/ (2015). Accessed 16 Aug 2016.
    1. Fox S. The Social Life of Health Information, 2011. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Life-of-Health-Info.aspx. Accessed 16 Aug 2016.
    1. Perrin A. “Social Networking Usage: 2005–2015.” Pew Research Center. October 2015. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-.... Access 16 Aug 2016.
    1. Saleh J, Robinson BS, Kugler NW, et al. Effect of social media in health care and orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics. 2012;35:294–7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120327-05. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eysenbach G, Kohler Ch. What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the internet. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:225–229. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources