Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Oct 22;20(1):336.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1520-1.

The modified SAVE score: predicting survival using urgent veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation within 24 hours of arrival at the emergency department

Affiliations
Observational Study

The modified SAVE score: predicting survival using urgent veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation within 24 hours of arrival at the emergency department

Wei-Cheng Chen et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: Although many risk models have been tested in patients who undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, few have been assessed for patients who received veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to successfully predict outcomes of patients with cardiac or noncardiac failure who received VA-ECMO in the ED within 24 hours of arrival at the ED.

Method: This retrospective, observational cohort study included 154 patients, who were classified as cardiac (n = 127) and noncardiac (n = 27) patients and received VA-ECMO within 24 hours after arrival at the China Medical University Hospital ED in Taiwan between January 2009 and September 2014. We recorded mechanical ventilation settings, arterial blood gases, laboratory parameters including plasma lactate level, requirement of catecholamines, and risk scores at time of ECMO initiation. ECMO and mechanical ventilation support duration, length of stay in the hospital, and 90-day mortality data were also examined.

Results: The overall mortality rate was 64.9 %. We used "survival after veno-arterial ECMO (SAVE)" scores to assess survival prediction in survival and nonsurvival groups, which was statistically different (-3.2 vs. -8.3, p <0.001). According to multivariate Cox proportional regression of survival, lactate (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.01, p <0.001) and SAVE score (HR = 0.92, [95 % CI, 0.88-0.96], p = 0.001) were independent predictors of outcome. Excellent discrimination (area under curve (AUC) = 0.843) was observed when lactate and SAVE score were combined, which we referred to as "the modified SAVE score."

Conclusions: Modified SAVE scores improved outcome prediction for patients who underwent urgent VA-ECMO in the ED.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Cardiac failure; Critical care; Emergency; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of enrolled subjects. A total of 154 patients received urgent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) within 24 hours after arrival at the emergency department (ED), including 127 patients with cardiac causes and 27 patients with noncardiac causes. ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, CCB calcium channel blocker, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, V-A mode veno-arterial mode, V-V mode veno-venous mode
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to different SAVE score classes. SAVE score Survival After Veno-arterial Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation score
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curves for predicting 90-day mortality in patients who receive emergency ECMO according to different variables. Various AUC values were seen when predicting 90-day mortality: SOFA (green line) = 0.65, lactate (gray line) = 0.79, SAVE score (blue line) = 0.73, and “the modified SAVE score” (combination of lactate and SAVE score) (red line) = 0.84. AUC area under the curve, ROC curve receiver operating characteristic curve, SAVE score Survival After Veno-arterial Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation score, SOFA score Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score

Comment in

References

    1. Ray P, Birolleau S, Lefort Y, Becquemin M-H, Beigelman C, Isnard R, et al. Acute respiratory failure in the elderly: etiology, emergency diagnosis and prognosis. Crit Care. 2006;10:R82. doi: 10.1186/cc4926. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen S, Holena D, McCunn M, Kohl B, Sarani B. A review of the fundamental principles and evidence base in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in critically ill adult patients. J Intensive Care Med. 2011;26:13–26. doi: 10.1177/0885066610384061. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mirabel M, Luyt C-E, Leprince P, Trouillet J-L, Léger P, Pavie A, et al. Outcomes, long-term quality of life, and psychologic assessment of fulminant myocarditis patients rescued by mechanical circulatory support. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1029–35. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820ead45. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brogan TV, Thiagarajan RR, Rycus PT, Bartlett RH, Bratton SL. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with severe respiratory failure: a multi-center database. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:2105–14. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1661-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. JAMA. 2011;302:1888–1895. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms