Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 22;16(1):612.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1846-z.

Towards comprehensive early abortion service delivery in high income countries: insights for improving universal access to abortion in Australia

Affiliations
Review

Towards comprehensive early abortion service delivery in high income countries: insights for improving universal access to abortion in Australia

Angela Dawson et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Improving access to safe abortion is an essential strategy in the provision of universal access to reproductive health care. Australians are largely supportive of the provision of abortion and its decriminalization. However, the lack of data and the complex legal and service delivery situation impacts upon access for women seeking an early termination of pregnancy. There are no systematic reviews from a health services perspective to help direct health planners and policy makers to improve access comprehensive medical and early surgical abortion in high income countries. This review therefore aims to identify quality studies of abortion services to provide insight into how access to services can be improved in Australia.

Methods: We undertook a structured search of six bibliographic databases and hand-searching to ascertain peer reviewed primary research in English between 2005 and 2015. Qualitative and quantitative study designs were deemed suitable for inclusion. A deductive content analysis methodology was employed to analyse selected manuscripts based upon a framework we developed to examine access to early abortion services.

Results: This review identified the dimensions of access to surgical and medical abortion at clinic or hospital-outpatient based abortion services, as well as new service delivery approaches utilising a remote telemedicine approach. A range of factors, mostly from studies in the United Kingdom and United States of America were found to facilitate improved access to abortion, in particular, flexible service delivery approaches that provide women with cost effective options and technology based services. Standards, recommendations and targets were also identified that provided services and providers with guidance regarding the quality of abortion care.

Conclusions: Key insights for service delivery in Australia include the: establishment of standards, provision of choice of procedure, improved provider education and training and the expansion of telemedicine for medical abortion. However, to implement such directives leadership is required from Australian medical, nursing, midwifery and pharmacy practitioners, academic faculties and their associated professional associations. In addition, political will is needed to nationally decriminalise abortion and ensure dedicated public provision that is based on comprehensive models tailored for all populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Literature review selection process. Preferred Reporting diagram for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) showing selection of publications for review

References

    1. Katz VL. Spontaneous and Recurrent Abortion-Etiology, Diagnosis, Treatment. In: Katz VL, Lentz GM, Lobo RA, Gershenson D, editors. Comprehensive Gynecology. 5. Philidelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2007.
    1. WHO . Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Barot S. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Are Key to Global Development: The Case for Ramping Up Investment. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2015;18:1.
    1. WHO . Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research; 2012. - PubMed
    1. Souza JP, Widmer M, Gülmezoglu AM, Lawrie TA, Adejuyigbe EA, Carroli G, Crowther C, Currie SM, Dowswell T, Hofmeyr J. Maternal and perinatal health research priorities beyond 2015: an international survey and prioritization exercise. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):61. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-61. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms