Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for Chinese patients with penile cancer: a multicenter collaboration study
- PMID: 27771796
- PMCID: PMC11819431
- DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2292-3
Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for Chinese patients with penile cancer: a multicenter collaboration study
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines recommend pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) for patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis and special state. However, these data and recommendations do not distinguish the role of PLND in different patient groups and confirm the final benefits. The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) for the different groups of patients.
Methods: Data obtained from 7 centers were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 190 pN2-3 penile carcinoma patients confirmed by bilateral inguinal lymph node excision were included in this study. Sixty-nine and 121 of these patients did and did not undergo bilateral PLND, respectively. The baseline differences from the patients were matched by propensity score analysis.
Results: In this study, the Kaplan-Meier estimated disease-specific survival (DSS) was not significantly different between the PLND and no-PLND groups (P = 0.796). According to the propensity score matching for T stage, N stage, grade, adjuvant therapies, and lymph node stage (number of inguinal lymph node metastasis and extranodal extension), 48 patients were selected for each group. Among the pN2 patients, the PLND group showed higher DSS rates than the no-surgery group (P = 0.030). However, even after matching, survival did not differ between the PLND and no-PLND patients among all patients (P = 0.609) and pN3 patients (P = 0.417) with comparable DSS.
Conclusion: Bilateral PLND may improve survival in pN2 patients. Men with pN3 may not benefit from bilateral PLND.
Keywords: Lymph node excision; Mortality; Neoplasm metastasis; Penile neoplasms.
Conflict of interest statement
All of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Is It Really Necessary? A Multicentric Longitudinal Study Assessing Oncological Outcomes in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection vs Radical Prostatectomy Only.J Urol. 2025 Aug;214(2):188-196. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004587. Epub 2025 Apr 28. J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40294214
-
Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19297079
-
Neoadjuvant therapy combined with a BMP regimen for treating penile cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: a retrospective study in China.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;140(10):1733-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1720-5. Epub 2014 Jun 7. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24906876 Free PMC article.
-
The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):84-109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 24. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28126351
-
Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in penile cancer may impact survival.World J Urol. 2016 Mar;34(3):353-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1593-5. Epub 2015 May 31. World J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26026817
Cited by
-
Pelvic lymph node dissection alone versus adjuvant radiotherapy in node positive penile cancer: A systematic review.Indian J Urol. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):91-98. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_453_21. Epub 2022 Apr 1. Indian J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35400869 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multimodal Treatment Combining Salvage Surgery-Assisted Chemotherapy and Checkpoints Blockade Immunotherapy Achieves Complete Remission on a Recurrent Penile Cancer Patient: A Case Report.Onco Targets Ther. 2021 Sep 22;14:4891-4896. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S319932. eCollection 2021. Onco Targets Ther. 2021. PMID: 34588783 Free PMC article.
-
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer With Inguinal Lymph Node Extranodal Extension: A Multicenter Experience.Front Surg. 2021 Jun 15;8:644273. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.644273. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34211998 Free PMC article.
-
Proposal of a Subclassification of pN3 in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):1346-1353. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16442-y. Epub 2024 Nov 12. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39532758
-
Is There an Oncological Benefit of Performing Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Penile Cancer and Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis?J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 13;10(4):754. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040754. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33668548 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Clark PE (2015) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines) penile cancer. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#penile
-
- D’Agostino RJ (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281 - PubMed
-
- Di Lorenzo G, Buonerba C, Federico P, Perdona S, Aieta M, Rescigno P et al (2012) Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in inoperable, stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. BJU Int 110:E661–E666 - PubMed
-
- Djajadiningrat RS, van Werkhoven E, Horenblas S (2015) Prophylactic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer. J Urol 193:1976–1980 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources