Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;17(12):88.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0647-6.

A Complete World Literature Review of Quality of Life (QOL) in Patients with Kidney Stone Disease (KSD)

Affiliations
Review

A Complete World Literature Review of Quality of Life (QOL) in Patients with Kidney Stone Disease (KSD)

Francesca New et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this study was to review the current evidence for quality of life (QOL) in patients with kidney stone disease (KSD).

Recent findings: A review of literature from inception to May 2016 for all prospective English language articles on QOL in patients with KSD was done. QOL studies post urological procedures or ureteric stents were excluded. Nine studies (1570 patients) were included of which most (n = 6) used the SF-36 QOL tool. Overall, seven of the nine studies demonstrated a lower QOL in patients with KSD. Bodily pain and general health were significantly lower in patients with KSD compared to their control groups. Patients with KSD have an overall lower QOL with most impact on bodily pain and general health domains. Compared to the scale of patients suffering from KSD, more work needs to be done in measuring QOL both in terms of 'Stone specific' QOL measuring tools and the quality/number of studies in this field.

Keywords: KSD; Kidney stone disease; QOL; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Francesca New reports personal fees from Coloplast and other from Storz. Bhaskar K. Somani declares no potential conflicts of interest. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Inclusion criteria for final review of patients

References

    1. Wong Y, Cook P, Roderick P, et al. Metabolic syndrome and kidney stone disease: a systematic review of literature. J Endourol. 2016;30(3):246–53. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0567. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tamatelou K, Francis M, Jones C, et al. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817–23. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pearle M, Calhoun E, Curhan G. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173:848–57. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hasanah C. Approaches and methodological as well as interpretative issues on QOL research in Malaysia. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2013;10(2):65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, et al. Validating the SF-36® Health Survey Questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br Med J. 1992;305:160–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. - DOI - PMC - PubMed