Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec 10:1:33-47.
doi: 10.2147/POR.S13335. eCollection 2010.

Causal diagrams, information bias, and thought bias

Affiliations

Causal diagrams, information bias, and thought bias

Eyal Shahar et al. Pragmat Obs Res. .

Abstract

Information bias might be present in any study, including randomized trials, because the values of variables of interest are unknown, and researchers have to rely on substitute variables, the values of which provide information on the unknown true values. We used causal directed acyclic graphs to extend previous work on information bias. First, we show that measurement is a complex causal process that has two components, ie, imprinting and synthesizing. Second, we explain how the unknown values of a variable may be imputed from other variables, and present examples of valid and invalid substitutions for a variable of interest. Finally, and most importantly, we describe a previously unrecognized bias, which may be viewed as antithetical to information bias. This bias arises whenever a variable does not exist in the physical world, yet researchers obtain "information" on its nonexistent values and estimate nonexistent causal parameters. According to our thesis, the scientific literature contains many articles that are affected by such bias.

Keywords: causal diagrams; derived variables; directed acyclic graphs; imputation; information bias; thought bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The causal structure of imputation by “measurement alone”.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The causal structure of variable derivation: any derivation (directed acyclic graph A); by any function of two variables (directed acyclic graph B); by a specific function of two variables (directed acyclic graph C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Theory-based substitution of derived diabetes status (AS) for unknown, true diabetes status (directed acyclic graph A); causal theories about the effect of diabetes on vital status (directed acyclic graph B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Examples of invalid and valid substitutions of AS for A, when AS is derived from Z.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Thought bias: type 1.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Thought bias: type 2. The arrow from F to G, with conditioning on G, indicates that the universe of all functions is often restricted to some subset.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Alternative structures for the causal relation of V (a natural outcome variable) with X (natural variable), Y (natural variable), F (universe of all functions of X and Y), and Dx,y (a variable derived from X and Y).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pearl J. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika. 1995;82(4):669–688.
    1. Hernán MA, Robins JM. A structural approach to observation bias. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(Suppl):S100.
    1. Shahar E. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(3):436–440. - PubMed
    1. Hernán MA, Cole SR. Causal diagrams and measurement bias. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(8):959–962. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shahar E. The association of body mass index with health outcomes: Causal, inconsistent, or confounded? Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(8):957–958. rejoinder 963–964. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources