Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 7:3:40.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2016.00040. eCollection 2016.

Unsustainability of Obesity: Metabolic Food Waste

Affiliations

Unsustainability of Obesity: Metabolic Food Waste

Mauro Serafini et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

The obesity burden, with 1.5 billion overweight (OW) and 500 million obese (OB) worldwide, significantly increased the risk of degenerative diseases. Excessive consumption of foods that are energy dense lead to obesity, which represents a titanic cost for not only the world's health systems but also a substantial ecological cost to the environment. The waste of resources and the unnecessary green house gas emissions (GHGs) emission, due to "obesigen" consumption of foods, have been ignored so far in practical assessments of ecological impacts. Our position is that food eaten above physiological needs, manifesting as obesity, should be considered waste. In this study, we developed a new indicator, metabolic food waste [MFW(kg of food)], corresponding to the amount of food leading to excess body fat and its impact on environment expressed as carbon [Formula: see text], water [MFW(×10 L)], and land footprint [Formula: see text]. Results shows that the average amount of MFW(kg of food) was of 63.1 and 127.2 kg/capita in a observational study on 60 OW and OB subjects. Animal products contributed mostly to MFW(kg of food) in both OW (24.3 kg) and OB (46.5 kg), followed by cereals, legumes and starchy roots (19.4 kg OW; 38.9 kg OB), sugar and sweets (9.0 kg OW; 16.4 kg OB), and alcoholic beverages (7.5 kg OW; 20.1 kg OB). When dietary intake corresponding to MFW was transformed in ecological indexes, animal products displayed the highest values for carbon emissions, water consumption, and land use in both OW and OB followed by cereals, legumes, and starchy roots. The estimated MFW(kg of food) of the Italian population resulted to be 2.081 million kilograms of food for OB and OW. Reducing obesity will make a contribution toward achieving sustainable and functional diets, preserving and re-allocating natural resources for fighting hunger and malnutrition, and reducing GHGs emissions. Although further evidences in epidemiological studies are needed, MFW represents an innovative and reliable tool to unravel the diet-environment-health trilemma.

Keywords: animal products; ecological footprints; functional diet; human; inflammation; metabolic food waste; obesity; sustainable nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Metabolic food waste corresponding to excess body fat from food commodities in overweight (OW) and obese (OB) subjects expressed as amount of food [MFW(kg of food)].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Metabolic food waste corresponding to excess body fat from food commodities in overweight (OW) and obese (OB) subjects expressed as (A) GHGs emission, MFW(kgCO2eq); (B) water consumed, MFW(×10 L water); (C) land used, MFW(×10m2 land).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage contribution of GHGs emission, formula imageMFW(kgCO2eq); water consumed, formula imageMFW(m3 water); land used, formula imageMFW(m2 land) to total MFW from food commodities in overweight and obese Italian population.

References

    1. HLPE. Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems. A report by the high. Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome: (2014). Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3901e.pdf
    1. Gustavsson G, Cederberg C, Sonesson U. Global Food Losses and Food Waste. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO; (2011). Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/mb060e/mb060e00.pdf
    1. Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S. Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2010) 365:3065–81.10.1098/rstb.2010.0126 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. IPCC. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Pachauri RK, Meyer LA, editors. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing Team. Geneva, Switzerland: (2014). 151 p. Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
    1. FAO. Food Wastage Footprints, Impact on Natural Resources. Summary Report. (2013). Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3347e/i3347e.pdf

LinkOut - more resources