Cost effectiveness of adding clostridial collagenase ointment to selective debridement in individuals with stage IV pressure ulcers
- PMID: 27774840
- DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1252381
Cost effectiveness of adding clostridial collagenase ointment to selective debridement in individuals with stage IV pressure ulcers
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness (from a payer's perspective) of adding clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) to selective debridement compared with selective debridement alone (non-CCO) in the treatment of stage IV pressure ulcers among patients identified from the US Wound Registry.
Methods: A 3-state Markov model was developed to determine costs and outcomes between the CCO and non-CCO groups over a 2-year time horizon. Outcome data were derived from a retrospective clinical study and included the proportion of pressure ulcers that were closed (epithelialized) over 2 years and the time to wound closure. Transition probabilities for the Markov states were estimated from the clinical study. In the Markov model, the clinical outcome is presented as ulcer-free weeks, which represents the time the wound is in the epithelialized state. Costs for each 4-week cycle were based on frequencies of clinic visits, debridement, and CCO application rates from the clinical study. The final model outputs were cumulative costs (in US dollars), clinical outcome (ulcer-free weeks), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at 2 years.
Results: Compared with the non-CCO group, the CCO group incurred lower costs ($11,151 vs $17,596) and greater benefits (33.9 vs 16.8 ulcer-free weeks), resulting in an economically dominant ICER of -$375 per ulcer. Thus, for each additional ulcer-free week that can be gained, there is a concurrent cost savings of $375 if CCO treatment is selected. Over a 2-year period, an additional 17.2 ulcer-free weeks can be gained with concurrent cost savings of $6,445 for each patient.
Conclusions: In this Markov model based on real-world data from the US Wound Registry, the addition of CCO to selective debridement in the treatment of pressure ulcers was economically dominant over selective debridement alone, resulting in greater benefit to the patient at lower cost.
Keywords: Collagenase ointment; clinical outcome; cost-effectiveness; debridement; economic outcome; healing rate; pressure ulcer.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing.J Med Econ. 2013 Jul;16(7):976-86. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.807268. Epub 2013 Jun 7. J Med Econ. 2013. PMID: 23701261
-
Cost-effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment on wound closure in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: economic analysis of results from a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.J Foot Ankle Res. 2015 Feb 28;8:7. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0065-x. eCollection 2015. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015. PMID: 25767565 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and economic assessment of diabetic foot ulcer debridement with collagenase: results of a randomized controlled study.Clin Ther. 2013 Nov;35(11):1805-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 18. Clin Ther. 2013. PMID: 24145042 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative cost and clinical effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment for chronic dermal ulcers.J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Feb;7(2):149-165. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0066. Epub 2017 Oct 27. J Comp Eff Res. 2018. PMID: 29076747 Review.
-
The role of collagenase ointment in acute burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Wound Care. 2019 Feb 1;28(Sup2):S9-S15. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup2.S9. J Wound Care. 2019. PMID: 30767636 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Economic analysis and budget impact of clostridial collagenase ointment compared with medicinal honey for treatment of pressure ulcers in the US.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug 16;9:485-494. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S133847. eCollection 2017. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017. PMID: 28860830 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical