Committee Opinion No. 679: Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery
- PMID: 27776074
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001771
Committee Opinion No. 679: Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery
Abstract
Immersion in water during labor or delivery has been popularized over the past several decades. The prevalence of this practice in the United States is uncertain because it has not been studied in births outside of the home and birth centers, and the data are not recorded on birth certificates. Among randomized controlled trials included in a 2009 Cochrane systematic review that addressed immersion in the first stage of labor, results were inconsistent with regard to maternal benefits. Neither the Cochrane systematic review nor any individual trials included in that review reported any benefit to the newborn from maternal immersion during labor or delivery. Immersion in water during the first stage of labor may be associated with shorter labor and decreased use of spinal and epidural analgesia and may be offered to healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies between 37 0/7 weeks and 41 6/7 weeks of gestation. There are insufficient data on which to draw conclusions regarding the relative benefits and risks of immersion in water during the second stage of labor and delivery. Therefore, until such data are available, it is the recommendation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists that birth occur on land, not in water. A woman who requests to give birth while submerged in water should be informed that the maternal and perinatal benefits and risks of this choice have not been studied sufficiently to either support or discourage her request. Facilities that plan to offer immersion during labor and delivery need to establish rigorous protocols for candidate selection; maintenance and cleaning of tubs and pools; infection control procedures, including standard precautions and personal protective equipment for health care personnel; monitoring of women and fetuses at appropriate intervals while immersed; and moving women from tubs if urgent maternal or fetal concerns or complications develop.
Similar articles
-
Committee Opinion No. 679 Summary: Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):1198-1199. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001765. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27776069
-
ACOG Committee Opinion no. 594: Immersion in water during labor and delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;123(4):912-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000445585.52522.14. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24785637
-
Immersion in water during labor and delivery.Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):758-61. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3794. Epub 2014 Mar 20. Pediatrics. 2014. PMID: 24652300
-
[Underwater delivery. Consensus of the Spanish Neonatology Society and the Perinatal Section of the Spanish Obstetrics and Gynecology Society].An Pediatr (Barc). 2015 Feb;82(2):108.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 26. An Pediatr (Barc). 2015. PMID: 25074709 Spanish.
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
Cited by
-
Prospective cohort study of water immersion for labour and birth compared with standard care in an Irish maternity setting.BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):e038080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038080. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33277276 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes following waterbirth: a cohort study of 17 530 waterbirths and 17 530 propensity score-matched land births.BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):950-958. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17009. Epub 2021 Dec 1. BJOG. 2022. PMID: 34773367 Free PMC article.
-
Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, November 2020.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Nov;49(6):605-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 21. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2020. PMID: 33096044 Free PMC article.
-
Culture, bathing and hydrotherapy in labor: An exploratory descriptive pilot study.Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 15. Midwifery. 2018. PMID: 29961561 Free PMC article.
-
Legionellosis following water birth in a hot tub in a Canadian neonate.CMAJ. 2017 Oct 23;189(42):E1311-E1313. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170711. CMAJ. 2017. PMID: 29061856 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Everson C. Maternal and newborn outcomes following waterbirth: the Midwives Alliance of North America statistics project, 2004 to 2009 cohort. J Midwifery Womens Health 2016;61:11–20.
-
- Lukasse M, Rowe R, Townend J, Knight M, Hollowell J. Immersion in water for pain relief and the risk of intrapartum transfer among low risk nulliparous women: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:60, 2393–14-60.
-
- Liu Y, Liu Y, Huang X, Du C, Peng J, Huang P, et al. A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:160.
-
- Otigbah CM, Dhanjal MK, Harmsworth G, Chard T. A retrospective comparison of water births and conventional vaginal deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;91:15–20.
-
- Royal College of Midwives. Evidence based guidelines for midwifery-led care in labour: immersion in water for labour and birth. London: RCM; 2012. Available at: https://www.rcm.org.uk/sites/default/files/Immersion%20in%20Water%20%20f.... Retrieved July 11, 2016.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous