Association Between Utilization of Quitline Services and Probability of Tobacco Abstinence in Low-Income Smokers
- PMID: 27776679
- PMCID: PMC5120741
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.08.014
Association Between Utilization of Quitline Services and Probability of Tobacco Abstinence in Low-Income Smokers
Abstract
Introduction: Quitlines (QL) are an effective means for smoking cessation, but a paucity of data exist examining the dose-response relationship between use of QL services and quit rates, especially among low-income smokers. The purpose of this study was to study the relationship between tobacco abstinence and use of QL services among low-income smokers.
Methods: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial of every- or some-day smokers aged 18 years or older visiting an urban emergency department. Inclusion criteria included self-pay or Medicaid insurance, as a proxy for low-income and low socioeconomic status. Intervention participants received a motivational interview, 6 weeks of nicotine patches and gum, a referral faxed to the state-sponsored QL, a booster call, and a quitline brochure. Control participants received the brochure. Smoking status was assessed by phone at 1 and 3 months, with confirmation via exhaled carbon monoxide testing at 3 months for those reporting abstinence. QL usage was obtained by utilization data from the QL database.
Results: Of 778 subjects, 197 (25.3%) reported any use of QL services at 3 months. Participants were trichotomized: no QL usage, 1 call only, and >1 call (583, 99, and 98 participants, respectively). Quit rates at 3 months in these no, low-, and high-use groups were, respectively, 7.2%, 9.1%, and 15.3% (P=0.03). Participants who used the QL had a median of 28 total minutes of telephone contact.
Conclusion: Among low-income smokers, greater use of QL services is associated with higher abstinence. Whether this resulted from a direct effect of the QL, or greater motivation among smokers using QL services cannot be determined from these data.
Keywords: Quitlines; Smoking cessation; Tobacco abstinence.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
B) Conflicts of Interest: none.
Figures
References
-
- Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. - PubMed
-
- Bandura A. In: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Bandura A, translator. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
-
- Bernstein SL, D’Onofrio G, Rosner J, O’Malley S, Makuch R, Busch S, … Toll B. Successful Tobacco Dependence Treatment Achieved via Pharmacotherapy and Motivational Interviewing in Low-Income Emergency Department Patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66(2):140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bonnie RJ, Stratton K, Wallace R. Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
