Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;18(1):59-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

Reliability and Validity of the Resistiveness to Care Scale Among Cognitively Impaired Older Adults

Affiliations

Reliability and Validity of the Resistiveness to Care Scale Among Cognitively Impaired Older Adults

Elizabeth Galik et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Resistiveness to care is behavior that prevents or interferes with caregivers' performing or assisting with activities of daily living and puts residents at risk for inappropriate use of antipsychotic drugs, other restraining interventions, social isolation, and physical abuse. The purpose of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of a previously developed Resistiveness to Care measure.

Procedures: This was a descriptive study using baseline data from an ongoing randomized controlled trial testing a Function and Behavior Focused Care (FBFC) intervention. Residents were eligible to participate if they were 55 years of age or older, had a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of 15 or less, and were not enrolled in hospice or admitted for subacute care. Descriptive information included age, race, gender, cognitive status, and marital status. In addition to the Resistance to Care Scale, the Barthel Index, the Physical Activity Survey in Long Term Care (PAS-LTC), and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) were completed. Psychometric testing was done using Rasch analysis and the Winsteps statistical program.

Main findings: The participants were moderate to severely cognitively impaired (MMSE of 7.23), functionally dependent (Barthel Index 47.31, SD 27.59), and engaged in only 134.17 (SD = 207.32) minutes of physical activity daily. Reliability was supported based on a Cronbach alpha of 0.84 and the DIF analysis, as there was no difference in function of the items between male and female participants. Validity was supported as all items fit the measurement model based on INFIT and OUTFIT statistics.

Conclusions: The findings support the reliability and validity of the Resistiveness to Care Scale for use with older adults with dementia in nursing home settings. Future work with the measure may benefit from the addition of items that are easier to endorse with regard to resistiveness to care (shutting eyes or spitting out food may be useful additions).

Keywords: Dementia; behavior; nursing home; resistiveness to care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mahoney E, Hurley A, Volicer L, et al. Development and testing of the Resistiveness to Care Scale. Research in Nursing and Health. 1999;22(1):27–38. - PubMed
    1. Ishii S, Streim JE, Saliba D. A conceptual framework for rejection of care behaviors: Review of literature and analysis of role of demeintia severity. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2012;13:11023. - PubMed
    1. Potts HW, Richie MF, Kaas MJ. Resistance to care. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 1996;22:11–16. - PubMed
    1. Algase D, Beck C, Kolanowski A, et al. Need-driven dementiacompromised behavior: An alternative view of disruptive behavior. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 1996;11(10):12–19.
    1. Herman RE, Williams KN. Elderspeak’s influence on resistiveness to care: Focus on behavioral events. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias. 2009;24(5):417–423. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types