Rounds Today: A Qualitative Study of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Resident Perceptions
- PMID: 27777662
- PMCID: PMC5058584
- DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00106.1
Rounds Today: A Qualitative Study of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Resident Perceptions
Abstract
Background: Attending rounds is a key component of patient care and education at teaching hospitals, yet there is an absence of studies addressing trainees' perceptions of rounds.
Objective: To determine perceptions of pediatrics and internal medicine residents about the current and ideal purposes of inpatient rounds on hospitalist services.
Methods: In this multi-institutional qualitative study, the authors conducted focus groups with a purposive sample of internal medicine and pediatrics residents at 4 teaching hospitals. The constant comparative method was used to identify themes and codes.
Results: The study identified 4 themes: patient care, clinical education, patient/family involvement, and evaluation. Patient care included references to activities on rounds that forwarded care of the patient. Clinical education pertained to teaching/learning on rounds. Patient/family involvement encompassed comments about incorporating patients and families on rounds. Evaluation described residents demonstrating skill for attendings.
Conclusions: Resident perceptions of the purposes of rounds aligned with rounding activities described by prior observational studies of rounds. The influence of time pressures and the divergent needs of participants on today's rounds placed these identified purposes in tension, and led to resident dissatisfaction in the achievement of all of them. Suboptimal congruency exists between perceived resident clinical education and specialty-specific milestones. These findings suggest a need for education of multiple stakeholders by (1) enhancing faculty teaching strategies to maximize clinical education while minimizing inefficiencies; (2) informing residents about the value of patient interactions and family-centered rounds; and (3) educating program directors in proper alignment of inpatient rotational objectives to the milestones.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Addressing Resident Concerns About Rounding Without Extending Rounds.J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Feb;9(1):136. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00619.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2017. PMID: 28261414 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Championing Mistakes: Reclaiming the Safe Learning Environment for Family-Centered Bedside Rounds.J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Apr;9(2):257. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00664.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2017. PMID: 28439368 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Osler SW. On the need of a radical reform in our methods of teaching senior students. The Medical News. 1903; 82: 49– 53.
-
- Stickrath C, Noble M, Prochazka A, et al. Attending rounds in the current era: what is and is not happening. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173 12: 1084– 1089. - PubMed
-
- Shankel SW, Mazzaferri EL. Teaching the resident in internal medicine: present practices and suggestions for the future. JAMA. 1986; 256 6: 725– 729. - PubMed
-
- Crumlish CM, Yialamas MA, McMahon GT. Quantification of bedside teaching by an academic hospitalist group. J Hosp Med. 2009; 4 5: 304– 307. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical