Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 18;6(18):6452-6459.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.2344. eCollection 2016 Sep.

Correlated evolution between targets of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection across squamate reptiles

Affiliations

Correlated evolution between targets of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection across squamate reptiles

Ariel F Kahrl et al. Ecol Evol. .

Abstract

Sexual selection reflects the joint contributions of precopulatory selection, which arises from variance in mating success, and postcopulatory selection, which arises from variance in fertilization success. The relative importance of each episode of selection is variable among species, and comparative evidence suggests that traits targeted by precopulatory selection often covary in expression with those targeted by postcopulatory selection when assessed across species, although the strength and direction of this association varies considerably among taxa. We tested for correlated evolution between targets of pre- and postcopulatory selection using data on sexual size dimorphism (SSD) and testis size from 151 species of squamate reptiles (120 lizards, 31 snakes). In squamates, male-male competition for mating opportunities often favors large body size, such that the degree of male-biased SSD is associated with the intensity of precopulatory selection. Likewise, competition for fertilization often favors increased sperm production, such that testis size (relative to body size) is associated with the intensity of postcopulatory selection. Using both conventional and phylogenetically based analyses, we show that testis size consistently decreases as the degree of male-biased SSD increases across lizards and snakes. This evolutionary pattern suggests that strong precopulatory selection may often constrain the opportunity for postcopulatory selection and that the relative importance of each selective episode may determine the optimal resolution of energy allocation trade-offs between traits subject to each form of sexual selection.

Keywords: Phylogenetic comparative method; sexual size dimorphism; sperm competition; testis size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Partial slopes (±SE) from phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS, black) and ordinary least squares (OLS, white) regressions of log10 testis size on log10 sexual size dimorphism (SSD) with log10 snout‐vent length (SVL) as a covariate. We conducted separate regressions for all lineages represented by ≥8 species, with sample sizes for each lineage shown at the tips of the phylogeny.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A, B) Relationships between phylogenetically adjusted and size‐corrected measures of testis size and sexual size dimorphism (SSD) across (A) 120 lizard species and (B) 31 snake species. Residuals were obtained from phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) regression of log10 testis size on log10 SVL (residual testis size) and PGLS regression of log10 SSD on log10 SVL (residual SSD). These residuals were used to visualize the covariance between testis size and SSD after accounting for phylogeny and allometry, but actual inferences (and reported partial r‐ and P‐values) are based on multiple regressions using PGLS with a size covariate. (C, D) Relationships between size‐corrected residuals obtained from regression (through the origin) of phylogenetically independent contrasts for log10 SSD regressed on independent contrasts for log10 SVL (residual contrasts of SSD) and of independent contrasts for log10 testis size regressed on independent contrasts for log10 SVL (residual contrasts of testis size). As above, relationships are shown separately for (C) lizards (N = 119 contrasts) and (D) snakes (N = 30 contrasts).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blomberg, S. P. , Garland T., and Ives A. R.. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745. - PubMed
    1. Calsbeek, R. , Bonneaud C., Prabhu S., Manoukis N., and Smith T. B.. 2007. Multiple paternity and sperm storage lead to increased genetic diversity in Anolis lizards. Evol. Ecol. 9:495–503.
    1. Carothers, J. H. 1984. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in some herbivorous lizards. Am. Nat. 124:244–254.
    1. Collet, J. , Richardson D. S., Worley K., and Pizzari T.. 2012. Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109:8641–8645. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox, R. M. , and Kahrl A. F.. 2014. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism Pp. 78–108 in Rheubert J. L., Siegel D. S., Trauth S. E. and Jamieson B. G., eds. Reproductive biology and phylogeny of lizards and tuatara. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

LinkOut - more resources