[Unilateral spinal anesthesia : Literature review and recommendations]
- PMID: 27778056
- DOI: 10.1007/s00101-016-0232-x
[Unilateral spinal anesthesia : Literature review and recommendations]
Abstract
Unilateral spinal anesthesia is a cost-effective and rapidly performed anesthetic technique. An exclusively unilateral block only affects the sensory, motor and sympathetic functions on one side of the body and offers the advantages of a spinal block without the typical adverse side effects seen with a bilateral block. The lack of hypotension, in particular, makes unilateral spinal anesthesia suitable for patients with cardiovascular risk factors e. g. aortic valve stenosis or coronary artery disease. Increasing numbers of surgical procedures are now being performed on an outpatient basis. Until now, spinal anesthesia has been considered unsuitable for this, not only because of the high incidence of intraoperative hypotension and postoperative urinary retention but also because of the prolonged postoperative stay before home discharge. This is not the case with unilateral spinal anesthesia: motor function returns rapidly, the incidence of urinary retention is extremely low, and patients are usually eligible for home discharge sooner than after bilateral spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia. The success of the technique depends on a number of factors. In addition to the local anesthetic, its concentration and dose, and the baricity of the injected solution, the shape of the spinal needle, the injection speed, the patient's position during injection, and the time the patient remains in this position after injection are equally important parameters. A number of intrathecally applied adjuvant drugs are used to give a more intense and/or longer-lasting block. For this review, we collated the published data on unilateral spinal anesthesia from journals with an impact factor greater than 1.0 and defined an optimized method for performing the technique. In order to achieve an exclusively unilateral block one should use 0.5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine injected at a rate of 0.33 ml/min or slower. During the injection and the following 20 min the patient should lie in the lateral decubitus position on the side intended for surgery with knees drawn to the chest. An injection of 5 mg (1 ml) hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % provides an hour-long block to T 12, and a dose of 7.5 to 10 mg (1.5-2.0 ml) extends the block to T 6. Adding clonidine (0.5 to 1.0 µg/kg BW) to the injection prolongs the duration of the block to approximately two to three hours. During the 20-minute fixation period, the cephalad spread of the block can be influenced to a certain extent by raising or lowering the head of the table.
Keywords: Hemodynamics; Injection speed; Local anesthetic; Sympathetic block; Unilateral spinal anesthesia.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the effects and complications of unilateral spinal anesthesia versus standard spinal anesthesia in lower-limb orthopedic surgery.Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 May-Jun;64(3):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014. PMID: 24907876 Clinical Trial.
-
Unilateral spinal anesthesia using low-flow injection through a 29-gauge Quincke needle.Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1188-91. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199606000-00015. Anesth Analg. 1996. PMID: 8638789 Clinical Trial.
-
Unilateral spinal anesthesia. State of the art.Minerva Anestesiol. 2001 Dec;67(12):855-62. Minerva Anestesiol. 2001. PMID: 11815746 Review.
-
Effect of cooled hyperbaric bupivacaine on unilateral spinal anesthesia success rate and hemodynamic complications in inguinal hernia surgery.J Anesth. 2016 Feb;30(1):26-30. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2081-1. Epub 2015 Oct 23. J Anesth. 2016. PMID: 26499112 Clinical Trial.
-
[Peribulbar anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia with facial nerve block. Techniques, local anesthetics and additives, akinesia and sensory block, complications].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Feb;204(2):75-89. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035503. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994. PMID: 8170098 Review. German.
Cited by
-
A Narrative Review on Multimodal Spinal Anesthesia: Old Technique and New Use.J Anesth Transl Med. 2025 Mar;4(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jatmed.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Mar 27. J Anesth Transl Med. 2025. PMID: 40321954 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of single spinal anesthesia with two doses ropivacaine on urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy in male patients.Front Surg. 2023 Jan 11;9:1077575. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1077575. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36713672 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia with Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jul;11(7):UC17-UC20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26235.10215. Epub 2017 Jul 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28893015 Free PMC article.
-
10-degree reverse Trendelenburg position on hemodynamic parameters and block characteristics in unilateral spinal anesthesia in below knee orthopedic surgeries - can head up position do the trick?J Med Life. 2022 Oct;15(10):1305-1310. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0016. J Med Life. 2022. PMID: 36420278 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Optimized Method of Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia: A Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Study.Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Apr 2;13(2):e135927. doi: 10.5812/aapm-135927. eCollection 2023 Apr. Anesth Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 37901148 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources