Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;41(2):487-497.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3746-0.

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture Post-esophagectomy with a Standardized Sutured Anastomosis

Affiliations

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture Post-esophagectomy with a Standardized Sutured Anastomosis

Zuhair Ahmed et al. World J Surg. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Benign anastomotic strictures occur frequently after esophagectomy, and impact on postoperative recovery, nutritional status, and quality of life. This large cohort study explored the incidence of stricture after transthoracic (2- and 3-stage) and transhiatal resections with uniform single-layer sutured anastomotic technique, and aimed to identify independent risk factors.

Methods: Patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction between February 2001 and October 2014 were studied prospectively. Symptomatic anastomotic stricture was defined as dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilatation, and refractory strictures as those requiring >5 dilatations. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors independently associated with stricture development.

Results: Five-hundred and twenty-four patients, 77 % with adenocarcinoma, underwent esophagectomy [2-stage, n = 328 (62.6 %); 3-stage, n = 129 (23.3 %); transhiatal, n = 74 (14.1 %)], with an overall inhospital mortality rate of 2.7 %. 58.5 % of patients received neoadjuvant therapy [chemotherapy only, n = 119 (22.7 %); chemoradiation, n = 188 (35.9 %)]. Anastomotic stricture developed in 125 patients (24.5 %), was refractory in 20 (3.9 %) and required a median of 2 dilatations (range 1-18). On multivariable analysis, ASA grade (P < 0.05), cervical anastomosis (P < 0.001), and a significant postoperative cardiac event (P < 0.05) were independently associated with stricture risk. Refractory strictures were independently associated with anastomotic leak (P = 0.01) and transhiatal resections (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Benign anastomotic strictures are common, particularly with cervical reconstruction, and after transhiatal resection. Refractory strictures are rare. Where fitness and oncologic equivalence apply, a thoracic anastomosis provides significant advantages compared with a cervical anastomosis in terms of anastomotic stricture risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMJ. 1994 Jan 15;308(6922):159-68 - PubMed
    1. Dis Esophagus. 2015 Jul;28(5):468-75 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 15;335(7):462-7 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;141(2):444-8 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr;198(4):536-41; discussion 541-2 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources