Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture Post-esophagectomy with a Standardized Sutured Anastomosis
- PMID: 27778075
- DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3746-0
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture Post-esophagectomy with a Standardized Sutured Anastomosis
Abstract
Background: Benign anastomotic strictures occur frequently after esophagectomy, and impact on postoperative recovery, nutritional status, and quality of life. This large cohort study explored the incidence of stricture after transthoracic (2- and 3-stage) and transhiatal resections with uniform single-layer sutured anastomotic technique, and aimed to identify independent risk factors.
Methods: Patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction between February 2001 and October 2014 were studied prospectively. Symptomatic anastomotic stricture was defined as dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilatation, and refractory strictures as those requiring >5 dilatations. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors independently associated with stricture development.
Results: Five-hundred and twenty-four patients, 77 % with adenocarcinoma, underwent esophagectomy [2-stage, n = 328 (62.6 %); 3-stage, n = 129 (23.3 %); transhiatal, n = 74 (14.1 %)], with an overall inhospital mortality rate of 2.7 %. 58.5 % of patients received neoadjuvant therapy [chemotherapy only, n = 119 (22.7 %); chemoradiation, n = 188 (35.9 %)]. Anastomotic stricture developed in 125 patients (24.5 %), was refractory in 20 (3.9 %) and required a median of 2 dilatations (range 1-18). On multivariable analysis, ASA grade (P < 0.05), cervical anastomosis (P < 0.001), and a significant postoperative cardiac event (P < 0.05) were independently associated with stricture risk. Refractory strictures were independently associated with anastomotic leak (P = 0.01) and transhiatal resections (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Benign anastomotic strictures are common, particularly with cervical reconstruction, and after transhiatal resection. Refractory strictures are rare. Where fitness and oncologic equivalence apply, a thoracic anastomosis provides significant advantages compared with a cervical anastomosis in terms of anastomotic stricture risk.
Similar articles
-
Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy.Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):1064-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181deb4b7. Ann Surg. 2010. PMID: 20485137
-
Predictive factors for refractory anastomotic stricture after cervical triangular anastomosis with gastric conduit reconstruction through the posterior mediastinum in minimally invasive esophagectomy.J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Dec;28(12):2001-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.09.015. Epub 2024 Sep 18. J Gastrointest Surg. 2024. PMID: 39303904
-
Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Jun;111(6):1141-6; discussion 1147-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70215-5. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996. PMID: 8642814
-
Anastomotic stricture complicating esophagectomy.Thorac Surg Clin. 2006 Feb;16(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.02.002. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006. PMID: 16696284 Review.
-
Risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12625-8. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39030531 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications after Resection of Esophageal Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 15;14(4):980. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040980. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35205730 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the modified Collard and hand-sewn anastomosis for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients: A propensity score-matched analysis.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018 Nov 8;3(1):104-113. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12220. eCollection 2019 Jan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018. PMID: 30697615 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of pre-diabetes, well-controlled diabetes, and poorly controlled diabetes on anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a two-center retrospective cohort study of 1901 patients.Esophagus. 2023 Apr;20(2):246-255. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00965-y. Epub 2022 Nov 1. Esophagus. 2023. PMID: 36319810
-
Mucosal Congestion on the First Day Following Endoscopy Predicts Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.World J Surg. 2022 Mar;46(3):631-638. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06397-6. Epub 2022 Jan 7. World J Surg. 2022. PMID: 34993600
-
Risk factors and therapeutic measures for postoperative complications associated with esophagectomy.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 23;55:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.011. eCollection 2020 Jul. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020. PMID: 32489659 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources