Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 25:7:13194.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13194.

Simulating the exchange of Majorana zero modes with a photonic system

Affiliations

Simulating the exchange of Majorana zero modes with a photonic system

Jin-Shi Xu et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

The realization of Majorana zero modes is in the centre of intense theoretical and experimental investigations. Unfortunately, their exchange that can reveal their exotic statistics needs manipulations that are still beyond our experimental capabilities. Here we take an alternative approach. Through the Jordan-Wigner transformation, the Kitaev's chain supporting two Majorana zero modes is mapped to the spin-1/2 chain. We experimentally simulated the spin system and its evolution with a photonic quantum simulator. This allows us to probe the geometric phase, which corresponds to the exchange of two Majorana zero modes positioned at the ends of a three-site chain. Finally, we demonstrate the immunity of quantum information encoded in the Majorana zero modes against local errors through the simulator. Our photonic simulator opens the way for the efficient realization and manipulation of Majorana zero modes in complex architectures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The braiding of Majorana zero modes and the mapping between the fermionic and spin models.
The spheres with numbers at their centres represent the Majorana fermions, γj, for j=1,…,6, at the corresponding sites. A pair of Majorana fermions bounded by an enclosing ring represents a normal fermion. The wavy lines between different sites represent the interactions between them. The interactions illustrated in a,b,c and d represent the Hamiltonians formula image, formula image, formula image and formula image, respectively. The letters A and B in each pane represent the corresponding isolated Majorana zero modes. The mapping between the Kitaev chain model (KCM) and the transverse-field Ising model (TFIM) through the JW transformation is shown in e. m3f and k3s are bases of the ground-state spaces defined in the KCM and TFIM (m and k=0 or 1), respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental setup for the simulation of the exchange of Majorana zero modes.
The process follows the logical diagram provided in the pane enclosed by the black solid line, denoted by Logi. The state of the three-spin-1/2 system can be expressed in the eight-dimensional space with the basis denoted by |l〉 (l=1 to 8), which are encoded as the spatial modes of photons. Cl are the corresponding amplitudes. For the initial Hamiltonian H0, the space is expanded by the basis of formula image. The polarization of single photons is rotated using HWPs and quarter-wave plate (QWPs), and the spatial modes are separated by BDs, each with a beam displacement of either 3.0 mm (BD30) or 6.0 mm (BD60). The state preparation is illustrated in the pane labelled Pre. The basis rotations BR1, BR2 and BR3 are used to express the input states in terms of the eigenstates of H1, H2 and H0, respectively. The dissipative evolutions DE0, DE1 and DE2 drive the input states to the ground states of H0, H1 and H2, respectively. Some of the detailed basis representations of the spatial modes are given in the right column. The solid magenta rings represent the preserved optical modes and the dashed magenta rings represent the discarded optical modes. The states indicated near the optical modes represent the corresponding preserved basis in the eight-dimensional space. Two types of measurements are performed, that is, TM and FM. Beam splitters (BSs) are used to send the photons to different measurement instruments. H, V, R and D represent the horizontal polarization, vertical polarization, right-hand circular polarization and diagonal polarization, respectively. Finally, photons are detected using single-photon detectors (SPDs).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental results on simulating the braiding evolution.
(a) The six experimental initial states after the first dissipative evolution DE0 with the dark green dot labelled as 1, cyan dot labelled as 2, magenta dot labelled as 3, dark yellow dot labelled as 4, violet dot labelled as 5 and navy dot labelled as 6 in the Bloch sphere. (b) The corresponding experimental final states after the second DE0 with the dark green dot labelled as 1′, cyan dot labelled as 2′, magenta dot labelled as 3′, dark yellow dot labelled as 4′, violet dot labelled as 5′ and navy dot labelled as 6′ in the Bloch sphere. The black dots in the poles of the Bloch spheres represent the corresponding theoretical predictions with the states |xxx〉 (+Z direction), formula image (−Y direction), formula image (−Z direction), formula image (+X direction, |03s〉), formula image (+Y direction) and formula image (−X direction, |13s〉), respectively. Owing to the experimental errors, the coloured dots (experimental results) are slightly separated from the corresponding black dots. The final states are shown to be rotated along the X axis by π/2 from the initial states. (c) Real (Re) and (d) imaginary (Im) parts of the exchange operator in the basis of {I(identity), X(σx), Y(σy), Z(σz)}, with a fidelity of 94.13±0.04%.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Experimental results on simulating local noises immunity.
(a) Real (Re) and (b) imaginary (Im) parts of the flip-error protection operator, with a fidelity of 97.91±0.03%. (c). Real (Re) and (d) imaginary (Im) parts of the phase-error protection operator, with a fidelity of 96.99±0.04%. The basis are expressed as {I(identity), X(σx), Y(σy), Z(σz)}.

References

    1. Wilczek F. & Zee A. Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2111–2114 (1984).
    1. Nayak C. S., Stern S. H., Freedman A. & Sarma D. S. Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083–1159 (2008).
    1. Fu L. & Kane C. Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008). - PubMed
    1. Sau J. D. L., Tewar R. M. & Sarma D. S. Generic new platform for topological quantum computation using semiconductor heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040502 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Kitaev A. Y. Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Phys. Usp. 44, 131–136 (2001).

Publication types