Association of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Low Back Pain and Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in a Population-based Cohort: The Wakayama Spine Study
- PMID: 27779607
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001960
Association of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Low Back Pain and Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in a Population-based Cohort: The Wakayama Spine Study
Abstract
Study design: Cross-sectional study.
Objective: To determine the association between lumbar spondylolisthesis and low back pain and symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in a population-based cohort.
Summary of background data: The basic epidemiology of lumbar spondylolisthesis is not well known. There is little information regarding the association between lumbar spondylolisthesis and clinical symptoms such as low back pain and LSS symptoms.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included data from 938 participants (308 males, 630 females; mean age, 67.3 years; range, 40-93 years). Lumbar spondylolisthesis was defined as a slip of ≥5%. Diagnostic criteria for symptomatic LSS required the presence of both leg symptoms and radiographic LSS findings on magnetic resonance imaging. The prevalence of low back pain and symptomatic LSS was compared between those with or without spondylolisthesis. Furthermore, we determined the association between the amount of slippage and presence of symptomatic LSS.
Results: The prevalence of spondylolisthesis at any level was 15.8% in the total sample, 13.0% in males, and 17.1% in females; the prevalence was not significantly different between males and females (P = 0.09). In both, males and females, symptomatic LSS was related to spondylolisthesis [odds ratio (OR): 2.07; 95% CI: 1.20-3.44]; however, no such association was found for spondylolisthesis and presence of low back pain. The amount of slippage was not related to the presence of symptomatic LSS (P = 0.93).
Conclusion: This population-based cohort study revealed that lumbar spondylolisthesis had a closer association with leg symptoms than with low back pain. There was a significant difference in the presence of symptomatic LSS between participants with and without spondylolisthesis. However, the amount of slippage was not related to the presence of symptomatic LSS.
Level of evidence: 3.
References
-
- Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. Diagnosis and conservative management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2008; 17:327–335.
-
- Kuntz KM, Snider RK, Weinstein JN, et al. Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25:1132–1139.
-
- Deyo R, Gray DT, Kreuter W, et al. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:1441–1447.
-
- Chen JC, Chan WP, Katz JN, et al. Occupational and personal factors associated with acquired lumbar spondylolisthesis of urban taxi drivers. Occup Environ Med 2004; 61:992–998.
-
- Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an epidemiological perspective: the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32:120–125.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials