Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2583-2599.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12594. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

Case Outcomes in a Communication-and-Resolution Program in New York Hospitals

Michelle M Mello  1 , Yelena Greenberg  2 , Susan K Senecal  3 , Janet S Cohn  4
Affiliations

Case Outcomes in a Communication-and-Resolution Program in New York Hospitals

Michelle M Mello et al. Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine case outcomes in a communication-and-resolution program (CRP) implemented to respond to adverse events in general surgery.

Study setting: Five acute-care hospitals in New York City.

Study design: Following CRP implementation, hospitals recorded information about each CRP event for 22 months.

Data collection methods: Risk managers prospectively collected data in collaboration with representatives from the hospital's insurer. External researchers administered an online satisfaction survey to clinicians involved in CRP events.

Principal findings: Among 125 CRP cases, disclosure conversations were carried out in 92 percent, explanations were conveyed in 88 percent, and apologies were offered in 72.8 percent. Three quarters of events did not involve substandard care. Compensation offers beyond bill waivers were deemed appropriate in 9 of 30 of cases in which substandard care caused harm and communicated in six such cases. In 44 percent of cases, hospitals identified steps that could be taken to improve safety. Clinicians had low awareness of the workings of the CRP, but high satisfaction with their experiences.

Conclusions: The bulk of CRPs' work is in investigating and communicating about events not caused by substandard care. These CRPs were quite successful in handling such events, but less consistent in offering compensation in cases involving substandard care.

Keywords: Medical liability; malpractice; medical error; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Resolution Determinations and Communications in CRP Cases (n = 125)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boothman, R. , Blackwell A. C., Campbell D. A., Commiskey E., and Anderson S.. 2009. “A Better Approach to Medical Malpractice Claims? The University of Michigan Experience.” Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law 2 (2): 125–59. - PubMed
    1. Grenon, V. , Hamamsy A., Schweitzer L., and Welle D.. 2015. “PEARL Report: 7 Years of Learning from Stanford's Communication and Resolution Program.” Internal report prepared by staff at Stanford's liability insurance carrier.
    1. Harris, P. A. , Taylor R., Thielke R., Payne J., Gonzalez N., and Conde J. G.. 2009. “Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—A Metadata‐Driven Methodology and Workflow Process for Providing Translational Research Informatics Support.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 42 (2): 377–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hickson, G. B. , and Entman S. S.. 2008. “Physician Practice Behavior and Litigation Risk: Evidence and Opportunity.” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 51 (4): 688–99. - PubMed
    1. Hickson, G. B. , Clayton E. W., Githens P. B., and Sloan F. A.. 1992. “Factors That Prompted Families to File Medical Malpractice Claims Following Perinatal Injuries.” Journal of the American Medical Association 267 (10): 1359–63. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources