Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 26;11(1):146.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7.

Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update)

Jamie Ross  1 , Fiona Stevenson  2 , Rosa Lau  2 , Elizabeth Murray  2
Affiliations

Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update)

Jamie Ross et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: There is a significant potential for e-health to deliver cost-effective, quality health care, and spending on e-health systems by governments and healthcare systems is increasing worldwide. However, there remains a tension between the use of e-health in this way and implementation. Furthermore, the large body of reviews in the e-health implementation field, often based on one particular technology, setting or health condition make it difficult to access a comprehensive and comprehensible summary of available evidence to help plan and undertake implementation. This review provides an update and re-analysis of a systematic review of the e-health implementation literature culminating in a set of accessible and usable recommendations for anyone involved or interested in the implementation of e-health.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between 2009 and 2014. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews of the implementation of e-health. Data from included studies were synthesised using the principles of meta-ethnography, and categorisation of the data was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results: Forty-four reviews mainly from North America and Europe were included. A range of e-health technologies including electronic medical records and clinical decision support systems were represented. Healthcare settings included primary care, secondary care and home care. Factors important for implementation were identified at the levels of the following: the individual e-health technology, the outer setting, the inner setting and the individual health professionals as well as the process of implementation.

Conclusion: This systematic review of reviews provides a synthesis of the literature that both acknowledges the multi-level complexity of e-health implementation and provides an accessible and useful guide for those planning implementation. New interpretations of a large amount of data across e-health systems and healthcare settings have been generated and synthesised into a set of useable recommendations for practice. This review provides a further empirical test of the CFIR and identifies areas where additional research is necessary.

Trial registration: PROSPERO, CRD42015017661.

Keywords: Implementation; Synthesis; Systematic review; Update; e-Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Currie WL, Seddon JJ. A cross-national analysis of eHealth in the European Union: some policy and research directions. Inf Manage. 2014;51(6):783–97. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.04.004. - DOI
    1. Lewis T, Synowiec C, Lagomarsino G, Schweitzer J. E-health in low- and middle-income countries: findings from the Center for Health Market Innovations. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(5):332–40. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099820. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Gemert-Pijnen J, Wynchank S, Covvey H, Ossebaard H. Improving the credibility of electronic health technologies. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(5):323-A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099804. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wachter RM. Making IT Work: Harnessing the power of health information technology to improve care in England. Report of the National Advisory Group on Health Information Technology in England. 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil.... Accessed 27 Sept 2016.
    1. NHS England. Five Year Forward View. 2014. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf. Accessed 17 Jun 2016.

Publication types