Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;22(11):1247-1259.
doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.11.1247.

Examination of the Link Between Medication Adherence and Use of Mail-Order Pharmacies in Chronic Disease States

Elena V Fernandez  1 , Jennifer A McDaniel  2 , Norman V Carroll  3
Affiliations

Examination of the Link Between Medication Adherence and Use of Mail-Order Pharmacies in Chronic Disease States

Elena V Fernandez et al. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Higher medication adherence is associated with positive health outcomes, including reduction in hospitalizations and costs, and many interventions have been implemented to increase patient adherence.

Objectives: To determine whether patients experience higher medication adherence by using mail-order or retail pharmacies.

Methods: Articles pertaining to retail and mail-order pharmacies and medication adherence were collected from 3 literature databases: MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA). Searches were created for each database and articles were compiled. Articles were screened for exclusion factors, and final articles (n=15) comparing medication adherence in patients utilizing mail and retail pharmacies were analyzed. For each study, various factors were identified including days supply, patients' out-of-pocket costs, prior adherence behavior, therapeutic class, measure of adherence, limitations, and results. Studies were then categorized by disease state, and relevant information from each study was compared and contrasted.

Results: The majority of studies-14 out of the 15 reviewed-supported higher adherence through the mail-order dispensing channel rather than through retail pharmacies. There are a number of reasons for the differences in adherence between the channels. Study patients who used mail-order pharmacies were more likely to have substantially higher prior adherence behavior, socioeconomic status, and days supply of medicines received and were likely to be offered financial incentives to use mail-order. The few studies that attempted to statistically control for these factors also found that patients using mail-order services were more adherent but the size of the differences was smaller. The extent to which these results indicate an inherent adherence advantage of mail-order pharmacy (as distinct from adherence benefits due to greater days supply, lower copays, or more adherent patients selecting mail-order pharmacies) depends on how well the statistical controls adjusted for the substantial differences between the mail and retail samples.

Conclusions: While the research strongly indicates that consumers who use mail-order pharmacies are more likely to be adherent, more research is needed before it can be conclusively determined that use of mail-order pharmacies causes higher adherence.

Disclosures: No outside funding supported this study. Fernandez was partially funded by a Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy PharmD/PhD Summer Fellowship for work on this project. The authors declare no other potential conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were contributed by Carroll and Fernandez. Fernandez took the lead in data collection, along with Carroll and McDaniel, and data interpretation was performed by Carroll and Fernandez. The manuscript was written and revised by Carroll and Fernandez, with assistance from McDaniel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No outside funding supported this study. Fernandez was partially funded by a Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy PharmD/PhD Summer Fellowship for work on this project. The authors declare no other potential conflicts of interest.

Study concept and design were contributed by Carroll and Fernandez. Fernandez took the lead in data collection, along with Carroll and McDaniel, and data interpretation was performed by Carroll and Fernandez. The manuscript was written and revised by Carroll and Fernandez, with assistance from McDaniel.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow Diagram of Article Selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Osterberg L, Blaschke T.. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(5):487-97. Available at: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra050100. Accessed September 19, 2016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. New England Healthcare Institute . Thinking outside the pillbox: a system-wide approach to improving patient medication adherencne for chronic disease. NEHI Research Brief. August 2009. Available at: http://www.nehi.net/writable/publication_files/file/pa_issue_brief_final.... Accessed September 19, 2016.
    1. Naderi SH, Bestwick JP WD.. Adherence to drugs that prevent cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis on 376,162 patients. Am J Med. 2012:125(9):882-87.e1. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934312000186. Accessed September 19, 2016. - PubMed
    1. Nieuwlaat R, Wilczynski N, Navarro T, et al. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(11):CD000011. Availble at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4/abstra.... Accessed September 19, 2016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donnan PT, MacDonald TM, Morris AD.. Adherence to prescribed oral hypoglycaemic medication in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Diabet Med. 2002;19(4):279-84. - PubMed

MeSH terms