Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses
- PMID: 27784985
- PMCID: PMC5066995
- DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S114890
Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the causes and possible solutions for patient dissatisfaction after the implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs).
Methods: This study was a retrospective review of clinical records. All patients who were seen between January 2009 and December 2013 whose primary reason for consultation was dissatisfaction with visual performance after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation were included in the study. A single treating physician, who determined the most probable cause of dissatisfaction, decided which interventions to pursue following the initial consultation.
Results: Data from 74 eyes of 49 patients were analyzed. The most common cause for complaint was blurry or foggy vision both for distance and near (68%). Complaints were most frequently attributed to residual refractive error (57%) and dry eye (35%). The most common interventions pursued were treatment of refractive error with glasses or contact lenses (46%) and treatment for dry eye (24%). Corneal laser vision correction was done in 8% of eyes; 7% required an IOL exchange. After the interventions, 45% of patients had completed resolution of symptoms, 23% of patients were partially satisfied with the results, and 32% remained completely dissatisfied with the final results.
Conclusion: The most identifiable causes of dissatisfaction after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation are residual refractive error and dry eye. Most patients can be managed with conservative treatment, though a significant number of patients remained unsatisfied despite multiple measures.
Keywords: cataract; intraocular lens; multifocal intraocular lens; presbyopia.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Donaldson is a consultant for Abbott Medical Optics and Alcon. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
References
-
- Finkelman YM, Ng JQ, Barrett GD. Patient satisfaction and visual function after pseudophakic monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):998–1002. - PubMed
-
- Wilkins MR, Allan BD, Rubin GS, et al. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2449.e1–2455.e1. - PubMed
-
- Pepose JS. Maximizing satisfaction with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: the missing links. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(5):641–648. - PubMed
-
- de Vries NE, Franssen L, Webers CA, et al. Intraocular straylight after implantation of the multifocal AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):957–962. - PubMed
-
- Hida WT, Motta AF, Kara-José N, Junior, et al. Comparison between OPD-scan results and visual outcomes of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(4):526–532. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
